<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Going Silent Has Never Been Easier (or Faster)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/silencers/going-silent-has-never-been-easier-or-faster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/silencers/going-silent-has-never-been-easier-or-faster/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 11:32:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Doc Samson		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/silencers/going-silent-has-never-been-easier-or-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-58940</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doc Samson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 11:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=26976#comment-58940</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/silencers/going-silent-has-never-been-easier-or-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-58756&quot;&gt;.40 cal Booger&lt;/a&gt;.

Agreed!  Never ceases to amaze me how frequently &quot;we&quot; fall into the trap of using the language of our enemies.  From headlines to rebuttals, if they control the language, they win before the argument even begins.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/silencers/going-silent-has-never-been-easier-or-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-58756">.40 cal Booger</a>.</p>
<p>Agreed!  Never ceases to amaze me how frequently &#8220;we&#8221; fall into the trap of using the language of our enemies.  From headlines to rebuttals, if they control the language, they win before the argument even begins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: .40 cal Booger		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/silencers/going-silent-has-never-been-easier-or-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-58756</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[.40 cal Booger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 18:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=26976#comment-58756</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Going Silent Has Never Been Easier (or Faster)&quot;

And you will not be going &#039;silent&#039; with a suppressor purchase either no matter where you purchase it from, tax or no tax.

We need to stop doing this.

Suppressors are not &#039;silencers&#039;, no matter how you want to phrase it.

&#039;silence&#039; is the absence of sound or noise. Suppressors do not make the firing sound or noise &#039;absent&#039;. They &#039;suppress&#039; (and even the term &#039;suppressors&#039; has issues as well) firing sound in terms of reducing to a lower level only marginally.

The anti-gun love using the term &#039;silencer&#039; to paint false pictures with words conjuring up images in ignorant peoples minds, feeding the confirmation bias of anti-gun people, of firearms use being &#039;undetectable&#039; because they are &#039;silent&#039; when a &#039;silencer&#039; is used thus a great threat. Its a complete lie. We just had an article presenting such an ignorant picture from an anti-gun person.

We need to stop using the term &#039;silencer&#039;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Going Silent Has Never Been Easier (or Faster)&#8221;</p>
<p>And you will not be going &#8216;silent&#8217; with a suppressor purchase either no matter where you purchase it from, tax or no tax.</p>
<p>We need to stop doing this.</p>
<p>Suppressors are not &#8216;silencers&#8217;, no matter how you want to phrase it.</p>
<p>&#8216;silence&#8217; is the absence of sound or noise. Suppressors do not make the firing sound or noise &#8216;absent&#8217;. They &#8216;suppress&#8217; (and even the term &#8216;suppressors&#8217; has issues as well) firing sound in terms of reducing to a lower level only marginally.</p>
<p>The anti-gun love using the term &#8216;silencer&#8217; to paint false pictures with words conjuring up images in ignorant peoples minds, feeding the confirmation bias of anti-gun people, of firearms use being &#8216;undetectable&#8217; because they are &#8216;silent&#8217; when a &#8216;silencer&#8217; is used thus a great threat. Its a complete lie. We just had an article presenting such an ignorant picture from an anti-gun person.</p>
<p>We need to stop using the term &#8216;silencer&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hush		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/silencers/going-silent-has-never-been-easier-or-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-58724</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 16:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=26976#comment-58724</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[FYI/FWIW:   TTAG now requires a click in permission to save name etc before a comment can be posted. 
And you&#039;ll see this message:  
Forbidden
You don&#039;t have permission to access this resource.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI/FWIW:   TTAG now requires a click in permission to save name etc before a comment can be posted.<br />
And you&#8217;ll see this message:<br />
Forbidden<br />
You don&#8217;t have permission to access this resource.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hush		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/silencers/going-silent-has-never-been-easier-or-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-58711</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 15:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=26976#comment-58711</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Note:  When you go to their website in the link posted in the article the age verification only goes back to the year 1945.  E. g. I am 82 and my year of birth was 1942.   Unless you click a year on the link that is not your year of birth you cannot access the website.   I called and the lady said to click a year that would allow entrance.  Seems to me that changing the 1945 to 1930 or something would be the proper thing to do; but she rejected that idea entirely.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note:  When you go to their website in the link posted in the article the age verification only goes back to the year 1945.  E. g. I am 82 and my year of birth was 1942.   Unless you click a year on the link that is not your year of birth you cannot access the website.   I called and the lady said to click a year that would allow entrance.  Seems to me that changing the 1945 to 1930 or something would be the proper thing to do; but she rejected that idea entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
