Comments on: SHOT 2025: Angstadt Arms New Suppressor Products https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/shot-show/shot-2025-angstadt-arms-new-suppressor-products/ Wed, 22 Jan 2025 16:24:28 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 By: Dude https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/shot-show/shot-2025-angstadt-arms-new-suppressor-products/comment-page-1/#comment-19254 Wed, 22 Jan 2025 16:24:28 +0000 https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=19516#comment-19254 In reply to .40 cal Booger.

*Avoiding the NFA hassle of an SBR. You still have to deal with the suppressor.

It’s my understanding that you also wouldn’t have to worry about crossing state lines with this. You need special permission with an SBR.

]]> By: .40 cal Booger https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/shot-show/shot-2025-angstadt-arms-new-suppressor-products/comment-page-1/#comment-19246 Wed, 22 Jan 2025 15:20:00 +0000 https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=19516#comment-19246 “Thanks to its 16-inch barrel length, owners can build a standard rifle instead of an SBR, avoiding the tax stamp and other NFA hassles”

Unless I’m wrong and something changed: An ‘integrally suppressed’ barrel is still a ‘suppressor’ under NFA. If you build a rifle with a 16 inch ‘integrally suppressed’ barrel you will still be subject to NFA and tax stamp.

Am I wrong or am I reading incorrectly what was written ?

]]>