<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A Tale of Two Home Invasions: Unarmed and Beaten to Death vs. Armed and Safe	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/self-defense/a-tale-of-two-home-invasions-unarmed-and-beaten-to-death-vs-armed-and-safe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/self-defense/a-tale-of-two-home-invasions-unarmed-and-beaten-to-death-vs-armed-and-safe/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 14:21:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: tsbhoa.p.jr		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/self-defense/a-tale-of-two-home-invasions-unarmed-and-beaten-to-death-vs-armed-and-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-146529</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tsbhoa.p.jr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 14:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=32780#comment-146529</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[who popped the inflatable doll?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who popped the inflatable doll?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris T in KY		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/self-defense/a-tale-of-two-home-invasions-unarmed-and-beaten-to-death-vs-armed-and-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-146118</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris T in KY]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=32780#comment-146118</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you are not carrying a gun while in your own home.  You are wrong.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are not carrying a gun while in your own home.  You are wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kanu		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/self-defense/a-tale-of-two-home-invasions-unarmed-and-beaten-to-death-vs-armed-and-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-144838</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kanu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 20:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=32780#comment-144838</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Oh look! Twenty-four arrests and he was still prowling the streets. Does anyone know if Raleigh has a Soros prosecutor?&quot;

Answer: No, Raleigh (Wake County) does not have a Soros district attorney.
https://www.theassemblync.com/politics/lorrin-freeman-balancing-act/

But we don’t know that the 24 arrests took place in Wake County. Durham is next door to Raleigh, and Durham does have a Soros district attorney. 
https://www.policedefense.org/santana-deberry/
The above link says incorrectly that Debarry is the Wake County DA but she’s actually the Durham County DA.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/satanadeberry/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh look! Twenty-four arrests and he was still prowling the streets. Does anyone know if Raleigh has a Soros prosecutor?&#8221;</p>
<p>Answer: No, Raleigh (Wake County) does not have a Soros district attorney.<br />
<a href="https://www.theassemblync.com/politics/lorrin-freeman-balancing-act/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.theassemblync.com/politics/lorrin-freeman-balancing-act/</a></p>
<p>But we don’t know that the 24 arrests took place in Wake County. Durham is next door to Raleigh, and Durham does have a Soros district attorney.<br />
<a href="https://www.policedefense.org/santana-deberry/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.policedefense.org/santana-deberry/</a><br />
The above link says incorrectly that Debarry is the Wake County DA but she’s actually the Durham County DA.<br />
<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/satanadeberry/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.linkedin.com/in/satanadeberry/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Lee		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/self-defense/a-tale-of-two-home-invasions-unarmed-and-beaten-to-death-vs-armed-and-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-144832</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Lee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 20:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=32780#comment-144832</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When seconds count, the police are only minutes away.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When seconds count, the police are only minutes away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CapnJack		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/self-defense/a-tale-of-two-home-invasions-unarmed-and-beaten-to-death-vs-armed-and-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-144817</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CapnJack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 19:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=32780#comment-144817</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What ever happened to the, &quot; Three Strikes And You&#039;re Out&quot; law ?

There are entirely too many people running around out there with multiple prior convictions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What ever happened to the, &#8221; Three Strikes And You&#8217;re Out&#8221; law ?</p>
<p>There are entirely too many people running around out there with multiple prior convictions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Deplorable		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/self-defense/a-tale-of-two-home-invasions-unarmed-and-beaten-to-death-vs-armed-and-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-144720</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Deplorable]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 14:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=32780#comment-144720</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll be honest... I threw up in my mouth when I saw that picture of the dead home invader Keilyn from his innocent high school days.  WTF?  An angel?  A turd would have been a better depiction of his life.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be honest&#8230; I threw up in my mouth when I saw that picture of the dead home invader Keilyn from his innocent high school days.  WTF?  An angel?  A turd would have been a better depiction of his life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: .40 cal Booger		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/self-defense/a-tale-of-two-home-invasions-unarmed-and-beaten-to-death-vs-armed-and-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-144697</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[.40 cal Booger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 13:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=32780#comment-144697</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Canada firearms confiscation scheme didn&#039;t work out too well:: Canadian &#039;Buyback&#039; Pilot Program Officially a Bust.

ht* tps://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2026/01/08/canadian-buyback-pilot-program-officially-a-bust-n1231142

[note: government mandatory-participation &#039;buy back&#039; is confiscation, and its not a &#039;buy back&#039; either. First, the government can not &#039;buy back&#039; something it never owned - its not even an actual legal-concept that a government can &#039;buy back&#039; someones personal property the government never owned. Second, mandatory participation means they offer you a very low price, pennies on the dollar, and you are required to surrender the gun for that price or they take you to jail and then take the guns anyway if you refuse to surrender for that price or at all - this is confiscation by threat-coercion using government force.]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canada firearms confiscation scheme didn&#8217;t work out too well:: Canadian &#8216;Buyback&#8217; Pilot Program Officially a Bust.</p>
<p>ht* tps://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2026/01/08/canadian-buyback-pilot-program-officially-a-bust-n1231142</p>
<p>[note: government mandatory-participation &#8216;buy back&#8217; is confiscation, and its not a &#8216;buy back&#8217; either. First, the government can not &#8216;buy back&#8217; something it never owned &#8211; its not even an actual legal-concept that a government can &#8216;buy back&#8217; someones personal property the government never owned. Second, mandatory participation means they offer you a very low price, pennies on the dollar, and you are required to surrender the gun for that price or they take you to jail and then take the guns anyway if you refuse to surrender for that price or at all &#8211; this is confiscation by threat-coercion using government force.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: .40 cal Booger		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/self-defense/a-tale-of-two-home-invasions-unarmed-and-beaten-to-death-vs-armed-and-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-144688</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[.40 cal Booger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 12:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=32780#comment-144688</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[No one lives in a &#039;safe neighborhood&#039; in today&#039;s world. Overall the threat vector bad guys do not fear the police or courts, or security cameras, or 911, or security guards, or well-lighted areas, or public places, or locked doors, or car alarms, or pepper spray or stun guns, or dogs, or you armed with a knife or club, etc...

At a minimum, in any &#039;living type&#039; of area (community, town, city, unincorporated or not, including rural communities clusters, gated communities or not, including workplaces and places where you shop or visit in the general public settings, or in schools or day cares or hospitals, even in your own yard, etc...): Every person in the United States, man-woman-teen-child-infant, no matter the political affiliation or ideology, no matter the amount of hired-security, no matter the responsiveness of the police, no matter the age, no matter the &#039;gender&#039; or &#039;sexual&#039; ideology/orientation, no matter the profession, no matter if &#039;reclusive&#039; or not - for every (collective) 6 hours in public view (including in your own home because the home is in public view) these will be targeted as a potential victim of a violent crime at least three times during that (collective) 6 hours in public view. Its just a matter of if the threat vector doing such targeting decides to carry out their crime or not.

Overall, using any means of defense other than a firearm and employing Defensive Gun Use (DGU) provides less than a 2% chance of escaping serious injury or death at the hands of a violent attacker. This non-firearm defense includes things such as fleeing, complying, hand-to-hand-combat, clubs, knife, barricading, call 911, deploying pepper spray by some method, yelling/screaming/blowing-whistles-or-air-horns, turning on the lights, etc... .

Overall, a firearm and employing DGU provides an over 97% chance of escaping serious injury or death at the hands of a violent attacker.

The next time a person, or an anti-gun organization, or a politician or a police department, or an internet article says you do not need a gun then ask them this simple question: &quot;If I am or my family is attacked by a violent person or a criminal breaks in - are you going to suddenly appear in that imminent and provide the needed &#039;I-need-defense-now&#039; defense against that?&quot; - if the answer is anything else but a simple one word &#039;No&#039; then they lied to you when they said that you do not need a gun.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one lives in a &#8216;safe neighborhood&#8217; in today&#8217;s world. Overall the threat vector bad guys do not fear the police or courts, or security cameras, or 911, or security guards, or well-lighted areas, or public places, or locked doors, or car alarms, or pepper spray or stun guns, or dogs, or you armed with a knife or club, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>At a minimum, in any &#8216;living type&#8217; of area (community, town, city, unincorporated or not, including rural communities clusters, gated communities or not, including workplaces and places where you shop or visit in the general public settings, or in schools or day cares or hospitals, even in your own yard, etc&#8230;): Every person in the United States, man-woman-teen-child-infant, no matter the political affiliation or ideology, no matter the amount of hired-security, no matter the responsiveness of the police, no matter the age, no matter the &#8216;gender&#8217; or &#8216;sexual&#8217; ideology/orientation, no matter the profession, no matter if &#8216;reclusive&#8217; or not &#8211; for every (collective) 6 hours in public view (including in your own home because the home is in public view) these will be targeted as a potential victim of a violent crime at least three times during that (collective) 6 hours in public view. Its just a matter of if the threat vector doing such targeting decides to carry out their crime or not.</p>
<p>Overall, using any means of defense other than a firearm and employing Defensive Gun Use (DGU) provides less than a 2% chance of escaping serious injury or death at the hands of a violent attacker. This non-firearm defense includes things such as fleeing, complying, hand-to-hand-combat, clubs, knife, barricading, call 911, deploying pepper spray by some method, yelling/screaming/blowing-whistles-or-air-horns, turning on the lights, etc&#8230; .</p>
<p>Overall, a firearm and employing DGU provides an over 97% chance of escaping serious injury or death at the hands of a violent attacker.</p>
<p>The next time a person, or an anti-gun organization, or a politician or a police department, or an internet article says you do not need a gun then ask them this simple question: &#8220;If I am or my family is attacked by a violent person or a criminal breaks in &#8211; are you going to suddenly appear in that imminent and provide the needed &#8216;I-need-defense-now&#8217; defense against that?&#8221; &#8211; if the answer is anything else but a simple one word &#8216;No&#8217; then they lied to you when they said that you do not need a gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
