Comments on: Smith & Wesson’s Three New M&P15 SBRs https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/smith-wessons-three-new-mp15-sbrs/ Wed, 25 Dec 2024 22:15:51 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 By: Darkman https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/smith-wessons-three-new-mp15-sbrs/comment-page-1/#comment-15359 Wed, 25 Dec 2024 22:15:51 +0000 https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=18077#comment-15359 In reply to Geoff ” Jingle *this* ” PR.

And good enough doesn’t require a $200 government fee.

]]> By: Dude https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/smith-wessons-three-new-mp15-sbrs/comment-page-1/#comment-15319 Wed, 25 Dec 2024 14:27:52 +0000 https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=18077#comment-15319 In reply to X Marks the Spot.

Of course you can switch out the upper on a registered SBR lower, but these don’t seem like good deals. Nearly $1,300? Yikes! I thought these were a semi-budget options.

]]> By: X Marks the Spot https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/smith-wessons-three-new-mp15-sbrs/comment-page-1/#comment-15264 Wed, 25 Dec 2024 03:41:35 +0000 https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=18077#comment-15264 In reply to Geoff ” Jingle *this* ” PR.

I’m pretty sure most people willing to waste money on tax stamps aren’t buying M&P ARs of all things.

]]> By: Geoff " Jingle *this* " PR https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/smith-wessons-three-new-mp15-sbrs/comment-page-1/#comment-15258 Wed, 25 Dec 2024 02:32:41 +0000 https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=18077#comment-15258 In reply to Darkman.

“Covered under NFA…No Thanks.”

All the more for the rest of us to buy and enjoy.

There’s an old saying – “The best is the enemy of the good enough”…

]]> By: Darkman https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/smith-wessons-three-new-mp15-sbrs/comment-page-1/#comment-15255 Wed, 25 Dec 2024 02:10:34 +0000 https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=18077#comment-15255 Covered under NFA…No Thanks.

]]>