<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Patriot Arsenal: 3 Guns Every American Should Own &#8211; The Rifle	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/patriot-arsenal-3-guns-every-american-should-own-the-rifle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/patriot-arsenal-3-guns-every-american-should-own-the-rifle/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 16:28:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Missy12		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/patriot-arsenal-3-guns-every-american-should-own-the-rifle/comment-page-1/#comment-129757</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Missy12]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 16:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=30944#comment-129757</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Patriot Ordnance Factory Revolution SBR AR-15 chambered in 308.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patriot Ordnance Factory Revolution SBR AR-15 chambered in 308.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: uncommon_sense		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/patriot-arsenal-3-guns-every-american-should-own-the-rifle/comment-page-1/#comment-124501</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[uncommon_sense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 20:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=30944#comment-124501</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/patriot-arsenal-3-guns-every-american-should-own-the-rifle/comment-page-1/#comment-124112&quot;&gt;Croak&lt;/a&gt;.

Croak,

I don&#039;t suppose that facts mean anything to you, eh?

On the off chance that you do pay attention to facts, here is a fact:  virtually everyone can &quot;instinctively&quot; point a handgun or rifle with combat effectiveness at close distances of roughly 10 feet or so.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/patriot-arsenal-3-guns-every-american-should-own-the-rifle/comment-page-1/#comment-124112">Croak</a>.</p>
<p>Croak,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t suppose that facts mean anything to you, eh?</p>
<p>On the off chance that you do pay attention to facts, here is a fact:  virtually everyone can &#8220;instinctively&#8221; point a handgun or rifle with combat effectiveness at close distances of roughly 10 feet or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John in Indy		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/patriot-arsenal-3-guns-every-american-should-own-the-rifle/comment-page-1/#comment-124149</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John in Indy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 00:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=30944#comment-124149</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Also get State specific training on the conditions required for the use of firearms in self-defense and in defense of others, as these standards may differ.
Good training classes should cover this info.
Find a lawyer competent in self-defense cases, and have that number saved on your phone.  Call before need, and find out how much money that call will cost. It likely will be worth it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also get State specific training on the conditions required for the use of firearms in self-defense and in defense of others, as these standards may differ.<br />
Good training classes should cover this info.<br />
Find a lawyer competent in self-defense cases, and have that number saved on your phone.  Call before need, and find out how much money that call will cost. It likely will be worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LKB		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/patriot-arsenal-3-guns-every-american-should-own-the-rifle/comment-page-1/#comment-124127</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LKB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 22:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=30944#comment-124127</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Article makes a great point that I and others noted years ago.   

Before 1994, VERY few of us had AR&#039;s.   Mini-14&#039;s were more popular and affordable, and milsurp M-1 carbines were widely available.   Semi-auto AK&#039;s were pretty unusual (SKS&#039;s, OTOH, were dime a dozen).   And because if you wanted an AR you were really dealing with either Colt or Armalite, they were also a lot more expensive (in real dollar terms).  

So besides there not being very many AR&#039;s out there in 1993, they tended to me more expensive than the comparables, and thus they weren&#039;t the kind of thing crooks used.

But they looked scary to the hoplophobes, and Clinton need to shore up his support with his base, so thanks also in no small part to some RINO&#039;s, we got the 1994 AWB.

Instantly, the value of &quot;pre-ban&quot; AR&#039;s went into the stratosphere, and everyone was working on &quot;workarounds&quot; that would let you produce a &quot;post-ban&quot; AR that skirted the law.   The demand was driven almost purely by Congress making them forbidden fruit, and so of course every gun guy wanted one.

Now fast forward to 2004.  The AWB is sunsetting, and Bush ain&#039;t going to continue it.  The floodgates open, and suddenly there are AR&#039;s from all over . . . and the price crashes, making it easier to acquire one.

But then we have Sandy Hook and Obama, and once again there was a land rush to buy as many AR&#039;s as you could before they got banned again.   By the time that petered out, the country was awash in AR&#039;s . . . due primarily to a series of stupid moves by gun grabbers to ban something that wasn&#039;t a problem in the first place.    And, of course, with that many people having them, they discovered they were great for 3-gun, varmint hunting, etc. . . . as well as for self defense.

What will be poetical is if SCOTUS holds that because they are now so ubiquitous, AR&#039;s are in &quot;common use&quot; and thus cannot be banned.   That will be karmic.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Article makes a great point that I and others noted years ago.   </p>
<p>Before 1994, VERY few of us had AR&#8217;s.   Mini-14&#8217;s were more popular and affordable, and milsurp M-1 carbines were widely available.   Semi-auto AK&#8217;s were pretty unusual (SKS&#8217;s, OTOH, were dime a dozen).   And because if you wanted an AR you were really dealing with either Colt or Armalite, they were also a lot more expensive (in real dollar terms).  </p>
<p>So besides there not being very many AR&#8217;s out there in 1993, they tended to me more expensive than the comparables, and thus they weren&#8217;t the kind of thing crooks used.</p>
<p>But they looked scary to the hoplophobes, and Clinton need to shore up his support with his base, so thanks also in no small part to some RINO&#8217;s, we got the 1994 AWB.</p>
<p>Instantly, the value of &#8220;pre-ban&#8221; AR&#8217;s went into the stratosphere, and everyone was working on &#8220;workarounds&#8221; that would let you produce a &#8220;post-ban&#8221; AR that skirted the law.   The demand was driven almost purely by Congress making them forbidden fruit, and so of course every gun guy wanted one.</p>
<p>Now fast forward to 2004.  The AWB is sunsetting, and Bush ain&#8217;t going to continue it.  The floodgates open, and suddenly there are AR&#8217;s from all over . . . and the price crashes, making it easier to acquire one.</p>
<p>But then we have Sandy Hook and Obama, and once again there was a land rush to buy as many AR&#8217;s as you could before they got banned again.   By the time that petered out, the country was awash in AR&#8217;s . . . due primarily to a series of stupid moves by gun grabbers to ban something that wasn&#8217;t a problem in the first place.    And, of course, with that many people having them, they discovered they were great for 3-gun, varmint hunting, etc. . . . as well as for self defense.</p>
<p>What will be poetical is if SCOTUS holds that because they are now so ubiquitous, AR&#8217;s are in &#8220;common use&#8221; and thus cannot be banned.   That will be karmic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: GWB		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/patriot-arsenal-3-guns-every-american-should-own-the-rifle/comment-page-1/#comment-124123</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GWB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 22:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=30944#comment-124123</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/patriot-arsenal-3-guns-every-american-should-own-the-rifle/comment-page-1/#comment-124122&quot;&gt;GWB&lt;/a&gt;.

Oh, I would also say if you want an &quot;American&quot; gun, consider the lever action pistol caliber. There are trade-offs with the AR, but it&#039;s a bit more &quot;traditional&quot; of American gun.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/patriot-arsenal-3-guns-every-american-should-own-the-rifle/comment-page-1/#comment-124122">GWB</a>.</p>
<p>Oh, I would also say if you want an &#8220;American&#8221; gun, consider the lever action pistol caliber. There are trade-offs with the AR, but it&#8217;s a bit more &#8220;traditional&#8221; of American gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: GWB		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/patriot-arsenal-3-guns-every-american-should-own-the-rifle/comment-page-1/#comment-124122</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GWB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 22:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=30944#comment-124122</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I would mostly concur with the author on the AR platform. I would probably pick a different caliber if I was really looking for close-up, but outside bad breath distance, defensive needs. Maybe a .300 Blackout. But the .223/5.56 is ubiquitous and you should be able to easily find ammo for it. It&#039;s also (since the smaller people in your family were mentioned) low recoil and reasonably accurate with even cheap barrels. I would suggest a .223 Wylde, however, so you never have to worry about whether you can shoot the _other_ caliber in it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would mostly concur with the author on the AR platform. I would probably pick a different caliber if I was really looking for close-up, but outside bad breath distance, defensive needs. Maybe a .300 Blackout. But the .223/5.56 is ubiquitous and you should be able to easily find ammo for it. It&#8217;s also (since the smaller people in your family were mentioned) low recoil and reasonably accurate with even cheap barrels. I would suggest a .223 Wylde, however, so you never have to worry about whether you can shoot the _other_ caliber in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: GWB		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/patriot-arsenal-3-guns-every-american-should-own-the-rifle/comment-page-1/#comment-124119</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GWB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 22:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=30944#comment-124119</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/patriot-arsenal-3-guns-every-american-should-own-the-rifle/comment-page-1/#comment-122701&quot;&gt;.40 cal Booger&lt;/a&gt;.

Learn about &quot;point shooting&quot;. Make it a part of how you bring the weapon up to aim. And then, when the tunnel vision means you&#039;re not really focused on the sights, your weapon will be where it needs to be. And it means you will likely find the sights more easily in that stressful situation. Point shooting is not something that replaces aimed fire, but it is a way to get the weapon to where you can most easily do aimed fire - or not.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/patriot-arsenal-3-guns-every-american-should-own-the-rifle/comment-page-1/#comment-122701">.40 cal Booger</a>.</p>
<p>Learn about &#8220;point shooting&#8221;. Make it a part of how you bring the weapon up to aim. And then, when the tunnel vision means you&#8217;re not really focused on the sights, your weapon will be where it needs to be. And it means you will likely find the sights more easily in that stressful situation. Point shooting is not something that replaces aimed fire, but it is a way to get the weapon to where you can most easily do aimed fire &#8211; or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Croak		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/patriot-arsenal-3-guns-every-american-should-own-the-rifle/comment-page-1/#comment-124112</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Croak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 22:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=30944#comment-124112</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/patriot-arsenal-3-guns-every-american-should-own-the-rifle/comment-page-1/#comment-122701&quot;&gt;.40 cal Booger&lt;/a&gt;.

Yeah, without any training, that&#039;s mostly true.  Which is why people should learn how to use their tools, because &quot;instinctive aiming&quot; ain&#039;t a plan, it&#039;s a hope.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/patriot-arsenal-3-guns-every-american-should-own-the-rifle/comment-page-1/#comment-122701">.40 cal Booger</a>.</p>
<p>Yeah, without any training, that&#8217;s mostly true.  Which is why people should learn how to use their tools, because &#8220;instinctive aiming&#8221; ain&#8217;t a plan, it&#8217;s a hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: .40 cal Booger		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/patriot-arsenal-3-guns-every-american-should-own-the-rifle/comment-page-1/#comment-123091</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[.40 cal Booger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 11:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=30944#comment-123091</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/patriot-arsenal-3-guns-every-american-should-own-the-rifle/comment-page-1/#comment-122701&quot;&gt;.40 cal Booger&lt;/a&gt;.

correction for : &quot;...or the treat is moving...&quot;

should have been...

...or the threat is moving..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/patriot-arsenal-3-guns-every-american-should-own-the-rifle/comment-page-1/#comment-122701">.40 cal Booger</a>.</p>
<p>correction for : &#8220;&#8230;or the treat is moving&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>should have been&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;or the threat is moving..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: .40 cal Booger		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/rifles/patriot-arsenal-3-guns-every-american-should-own-the-rifle/comment-page-1/#comment-122701</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[.40 cal Booger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 13:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=30944#comment-122701</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[At average internal home defense distances, about 15 feet or less, ya most likely don&#039;t need a dot optic on a rifle or shotgun. And at those distances, especially within 10 feet or closer and especially if you or the treat is moving, if its a very sudden appearing imminent threat you most likely will not even see the iron-sights, or a dot-sight if you have one, and will be most likely be using the human brain natural &#039;instinctive aiming&#039; alignment of the hands which also happen to hold the gun.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At average internal home defense distances, about 15 feet or less, ya most likely don&#8217;t need a dot optic on a rifle or shotgun. And at those distances, especially within 10 feet or closer and especially if you or the treat is moving, if its a very sudden appearing imminent threat you most likely will not even see the iron-sights, or a dot-sight if you have one, and will be most likely be using the human brain natural &#8216;instinctive aiming&#8217; alignment of the hands which also happen to hold the gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
