Comments on: Silencer Central: We Support the Hearing Protection Act and Have Never Lobbied Against It

By: Subrider

Subrider — Tue, 20 May 2025 19:33:18 +0000

You nailed it with “Stupid Party”. They cannot stick together on anything. The old school Republicans are so out of touch with the MAGA movement that they are in need of being primaried out.

By: Robert

Robert — Mon, 19 May 2025 02:35:34 +0000

In reply to JC.

Indeed, the ATF is in court saying suppressors aren’t firearms……So which is it? You can’t make this crap up.

By: Robert

Robert — Mon, 19 May 2025 02:31:55 +0000

In reply to Ronald Lawrence. Exactly. They are playing games they're not going to win. Last suppressor I will ever buy from them. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes with your business.

By: Wilfred Moreno

Wilfred Moreno — Sun, 18 May 2025 21:14:44 +0000

You don’t go into any business unless you want to make a profit. Hopefully a fair profit. It’s the American way. But I still don’t understand why silencers for the most part cause the same who or more than a firearm. I know I am simplifying it, but the end result is that it’s a tube with baffles.
Thank you for letting me ask my question. Wish you guys continue success.

By: D.Jones

D.Jones — Sat, 17 May 2025 03:48:59 +0000

Repeal the bastard hughes amendment, reinstate/allow imports that traitor bush/bentsen authored the ban in 1989.
The voting record of each of these reps./sinaturs must be on the record of all the pro 2nd Civil Rights 2nd Amendment organizations.
NOW and next election. Especially the primary!
NO remorse. NO recourse. NO reconsideration. No pity.
NO QUARTER.
EVER!
I just sent another donation to Gun Owners of America to put my money where my mouth is. Time is of the essence. The time is Now.

By: .40 cal Booger

.40 cal Booger — Fri, 16 May 2025 17:42:45 +0000

Breaking: House Budget Committee Fails to Advance Reconciliation Bill.

“The reconciliation package that House Republicans have been working to advance has hit a snag: It failed to make it out of the Budget Committee on Friday.
…”
(note: failed to make it out of the Budget Committee on Friday 16 May 2025, today as of this post.)

https://redstate.com/smoosieq/2025/05/16/breaking-house-budget-committee-fails-to-advance-reconciliation-bill-n2189181

By: Chris T in KY

Chris T in KY — Fri, 16 May 2025 16:45:06 +0000

It’s really sad. But I’m glad this was explained. The process really is like making sausage.

For those that forgot. The founders made the process to make law difficult on purpose. So it’s important to stop bad laws from being created in the first place.

This is a first step. I’d like the $200 tax to just go away entirely.
Lowering and eliminating taxes has always been the goal.

Getting them delisted and no additional tax would be great. But we live in the real world. Not a utopia.

By: .40 cal Booger

.40 cal Booger — Fri, 16 May 2025 16:22:45 +0000

In reply to JC. Its because suppressors are classed as firearms in federal law and firearms fall under the GCA (also). Just because something is under NFA does not mean it stops being what its classed as under law if its removed from the NFA. So if suppressors are removed from the NFA it does not change how its classed under federal law, they would still be classed as 'firearm' under federal law and still subject to the GCA.

By: Ronald Lawrence

Ronald Lawrence — Fri, 16 May 2025 15:06:51 +0000

To me, it’s pretty obvious that Silencer Central was not fully in line with the rest of us. Welcome to Bud Lite land.

By: JC

JC — Fri, 16 May 2025 14:55:01 +0000

I don’t follow how removing suppressors from the NFA pushes them into the GCA. Unless they are already listed there and I’m unaware.