<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why are Democrats Working So Hard to Outlaw Body Armor?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/op-ed/why-are-democrats-working-so-hard-to-outlaw-body-armor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/op-ed/why-are-democrats-working-so-hard-to-outlaw-body-armor/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 06:38:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: fppf		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/op-ed/why-are-democrats-working-so-hard-to-outlaw-body-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-2922</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fppf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 06:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=7422#comment-2922</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[yes, why are they? this article doesn&#039;t answer that question. i&#039;m genuinely curious why they think it&#039;s bad for people to buy metal plate.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, why are they? this article doesn&#8217;t answer that question. i&#8217;m genuinely curious why they think it&#8217;s bad for people to buy metal plate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dmitar		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/op-ed/why-are-democrats-working-so-hard-to-outlaw-body-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-2892</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dmitar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2024 20:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=7422#comment-2892</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Meng is chinese and a spy for the CCP as far as I am concerned so naturally she wants a disarmed unarmored populace]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meng is chinese and a spy for the CCP as far as I am concerned so naturally she wants a disarmed unarmored populace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/op-ed/why-are-democrats-working-so-hard-to-outlaw-body-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-2855</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 23:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=7422#comment-2855</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/op-ed/why-are-democrats-working-so-hard-to-outlaw-body-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-2841&quot;&gt;Shire-man&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;2) They want you to be easier to kill when their feeb goon squads come knockin’ for your wrongthink crimes.&quot;

Exactly. it&#039;s about *their* safety when they are coming to to kill you, not the general public&#039;s .safety&#039;.

For that reason alone, that bill most be stopped...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/op-ed/why-are-democrats-working-so-hard-to-outlaw-body-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-2841">Shire-man</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;2) They want you to be easier to kill when their feeb goon squads come knockin’ for your wrongthink crimes.&#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly. it&#8217;s about *their* safety when they are coming to to kill you, not the general public&#8217;s .safety&#8217;.</p>
<p>For that reason alone, that bill most be stopped&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Darkman		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/op-ed/why-are-democrats-working-so-hard-to-outlaw-body-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-2847</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 17:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=7422#comment-2847</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/op-ed/why-are-democrats-working-so-hard-to-outlaw-body-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-2841&quot;&gt;Shire-man&lt;/a&gt;.

It&#039;s just another example of the Death by a Thousand cuts Democrats have been using against the 2nd Amendment for decades. Kinda like 
whack a mole. If they miss or fail in one part of their attack they simple move to another front and continue. As long as the ideology and those who support it are Allowed. They will never stop in the efforts to destroy the 2nd Amendment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/op-ed/why-are-democrats-working-so-hard-to-outlaw-body-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-2841">Shire-man</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just another example of the Death by a Thousand cuts Democrats have been using against the 2nd Amendment for decades. Kinda like<br />
whack a mole. If they miss or fail in one part of their attack they simple move to another front and continue. As long as the ideology and those who support it are Allowed. They will never stop in the efforts to destroy the 2nd Amendment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Paul		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/op-ed/why-are-democrats-working-so-hard-to-outlaw-body-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-2845</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 16:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=7422#comment-2845</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Any and all &quot;laws&quot; that exempt the state while curtailing the liberty of the people are the definition of tyranny and de facto unlawful, unconstitutional and criminal in nature.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any and all &#8220;laws&#8221; that exempt the state while curtailing the liberty of the people are the definition of tyranny and de facto unlawful, unconstitutional and criminal in nature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: .40 cal Booger		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/op-ed/why-are-democrats-working-so-hard-to-outlaw-body-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-2842</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[.40 cal Booger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 15:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=7422#comment-2842</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;It should not be the case that anyone with internet access can purchase equipment designed to stop military-grade ammunition,”

Sigh... once again, actually there is no such thing as &quot;military-grade ammunition&quot; for small arms firearms. There is ammo the military procures for its use, it may be relatively more reliable and increasingly accurate (or not) (depending on what they buy) in comparison to the low-end (as in price) regular grade the civilian market can buy (for the civilian market 99.99% of its just as reliable and accurate as what the military uses). Military ammo, for those manufactures that do sell to the military, comes off the same line that produces the ammo for the civilian market with the same &#039;military&#039; type specs the military specs when it buys ammo, government can use our tax dollars to buy &#039;in large bulk&#039; that ammo and this is what gives it the moniker &quot;military-grade ammunition&quot; - the moniker does not mean its anything special. The same ammo is available to the civilian market, and if one wants to pay the increased price for &quot;more reliable and increasingly accurate&quot; compared to the price of the low-end (price) regular grade ammo, a person can do that just as the military can. No one manufacturers ammo for small arms firearms that is classed or graded or manufactured as only specifically &quot;military-grade ammunition&quot; as if its a &#039;special&#039; ammo (although, at least one manufacturer does call it &quot;military-grade ammunition&quot; when its a bulk order for the military) . On the other hand 99.99% of military ammunition can be somewhat less accurate than the higher-end, more expensive grades of civilian market ammunition. 

So already, no one can &quot;purchase&quot; body armor &quot;designed to stop military-grade ammunition&quot;, not even the government can buy it, because there is no such thing as &quot;military-grade ammunition&quot;.

This is the typical anti-gun sensationalism of a term to make it seem more unique. &quot;Oh no...military-grade ammunition ... gasp, gotta stop that!&quot; - basically, its just regular ammo, same ammo the civilian market can get, sold to the military in large quantity bulk]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It should not be the case that anyone with internet access can purchase equipment designed to stop military-grade ammunition,”</p>
<p>Sigh&#8230; once again, actually there is no such thing as &#8220;military-grade ammunition&#8221; for small arms firearms. There is ammo the military procures for its use, it may be relatively more reliable and increasingly accurate (or not) (depending on what they buy) in comparison to the low-end (as in price) regular grade the civilian market can buy (for the civilian market 99.99% of its just as reliable and accurate as what the military uses). Military ammo, for those manufactures that do sell to the military, comes off the same line that produces the ammo for the civilian market with the same &#8216;military&#8217; type specs the military specs when it buys ammo, government can use our tax dollars to buy &#8216;in large bulk&#8217; that ammo and this is what gives it the moniker &#8220;military-grade ammunition&#8221; &#8211; the moniker does not mean its anything special. The same ammo is available to the civilian market, and if one wants to pay the increased price for &#8220;more reliable and increasingly accurate&#8221; compared to the price of the low-end (price) regular grade ammo, a person can do that just as the military can. No one manufacturers ammo for small arms firearms that is classed or graded or manufactured as only specifically &#8220;military-grade ammunition&#8221; as if its a &#8216;special&#8217; ammo (although, at least one manufacturer does call it &#8220;military-grade ammunition&#8221; when its a bulk order for the military) . On the other hand 99.99% of military ammunition can be somewhat less accurate than the higher-end, more expensive grades of civilian market ammunition. </p>
<p>So already, no one can &#8220;purchase&#8221; body armor &#8220;designed to stop military-grade ammunition&#8221;, not even the government can buy it, because there is no such thing as &#8220;military-grade ammunition&#8221;.</p>
<p>This is the typical anti-gun sensationalism of a term to make it seem more unique. &#8220;Oh no&#8230;military-grade ammunition &#8230; gasp, gotta stop that!&#8221; &#8211; basically, its just regular ammo, same ammo the civilian market can get, sold to the military in large quantity bulk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Shire-man		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/op-ed/why-are-democrats-working-so-hard-to-outlaw-body-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-2841</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shire-man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 15:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=7422#comment-2841</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[1) It&#039;s seen as low-hanging fruit that most of the moron public can get behind like Saturday Night Specials in the 70&#039;s, machineguns in the 80&#039;s and evil black rifles in the 90&#039;s.

2) They want you to be easier to kill when their feeb goon squads come knockin&#039; for your wrongthink crimes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) It&#8217;s seen as low-hanging fruit that most of the moron public can get behind like Saturday Night Specials in the 70&#8217;s, machineguns in the 80&#8217;s and evil black rifles in the 90&#8217;s.</p>
<p>2) They want you to be easier to kill when their feeb goon squads come knockin&#8217; for your wrongthink crimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
