<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Survey: Overwhelming Majority of Non-Hunting Gun Owners Support Pittman-Robertson Conservation Tax	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/nssf/survey-overwhelming-majority-of-non-hunting-gun-owners-support-pittman-robertson-conservation-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/nssf/survey-overwhelming-majority-of-non-hunting-gun-owners-support-pittman-robertson-conservation-tax/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2024 12:06:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: IN Dave		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/nssf/survey-overwhelming-majority-of-non-hunting-gun-owners-support-pittman-robertson-conservation-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IN Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2024 12:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=2563#comment-18</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This will probably be an unpopular opinion but I would be okay with similar fund going to mental health and suicide prevention. Every time a mass shooting happens we point out that it is a mental health issue but then do nothing to try to change the mental health environment. Biggest problem with that is the government has zero desire to actually fix the problem so it would likely be a tax in which no benefit is ever seen or worse, used against us. 

I would happily support any gun or ammo or firearm accessory manufacture that stated that a portion of their profit or sales event went to develop mental health care, access, and/or research that is does NOT push an antigun agenda.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will probably be an unpopular opinion but I would be okay with similar fund going to mental health and suicide prevention. Every time a mass shooting happens we point out that it is a mental health issue but then do nothing to try to change the mental health environment. Biggest problem with that is the government has zero desire to actually fix the problem so it would likely be a tax in which no benefit is ever seen or worse, used against us. </p>
<p>I would happily support any gun or ammo or firearm accessory manufacture that stated that a portion of their profit or sales event went to develop mental health care, access, and/or research that is does NOT push an antigun agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
