CASE-IN-POINT: It was not very long ago that a 75″ TELEVISION would set you back a few THOUSAND DOLLARS and now you can pick them up at WALMART or BEST BUY for a few HUNDRED DOLLARS! So, with all that being said, “JUST WAIT”!

I’m in the gun community and I support grenade ownership. I support Glock switches and would buy a Glock just to put a switch on it.

Chris self control IS all but gone in most big lib controlled cities. Unless/until that changes things will only get worse.
They didn’t have it this bad 150+ years ago because jails and prisons weren’t a money making business like they are now.
You didn’t get a life sentence you got a rope.

Huh … what?

And it seems no one wants to ask about hand grenades. So I will ask.

What about hand grenade ownership???

The problem with the “gun community” in the 21st century, is many don’t really believe in the concept of responsibility. When they say they believe in freedom.

And the general public has a very difficult time supporting glock switch ownership. The “gun community” certainly doesn’t support their ownership.

The liberty we have in the USA has only existed this long, because there has been an unspoken requirement for self control.

And that is going away. As the police stand down and do nothing. When rioters smash and burn cities to the ground.

When you don’t support the police. And you also don’t support civilians like Joe Horn. Who shot two illegal alien criminals.

The end result is you get the military acting as local law enforcement. And that is happening right now.

There are more criminals on the streets because of open borders. And because the Libertarians Liberals and leftists wanted the jails emptied in 2020.

Basically; In the 1930’s, the Supreme Court only narrowly upheld the NFA solely as a tax statute – not as a firearms regulatory law. In Sonzinsky v. United States (1937), the Court ruled the NFA was (basically only) permissible under Congress’s TAXING power. Others over time touched on it, but basically in all cases SCOTUS has made clear that the NFA survives only as a tax law [as it was originally created an intended by congress]. With a tax of $0, the constitutional justification for the law collapses and the ‘registration’ goes away.

I can’t, maybe, see the Trump DOJ fighting all that hard in court to preserve something Trump said he was going to get rid of, and got thrown out of the BBB because the Democrats fought the BBB all the way.

You mean the precedents already set during the last years…you missed those?

“And we know that ‘perfectly well’ why?”
Because the courts never miss a chance a to F over the 2A. Where have YOU been for the last 90+ years?