We’ve been slowly rolling back some bad decisions from the past. I think there will be more to come. Of course, SCOTUS is unpredictable.

I’m in the gun community and I support full auto for all. Rights don’t have age limits. I also support bump stocks. They’re fun. Chris, you have created rigid stereotypes in your own mind. More people than you’d think support full auto ownership. If someone can’t be trusted to have all of their rights, they shouldn’t be in public unsupervised.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9yxwv5hrhc&pp

Well said.

Courts do not appear to be virtuous and rule on peon privileges such as keeping and bearing arms, preferring instead to keep 2A a second class right. None of the regulations in the NFA or GCA would pass constitutional muster if applied to:

“A Republic, if you can keep it”.

For whatever good it will do, I called Senators to introduce articles of Impeachment for Griffin and Nalbandian for substituting Heller’s actual text for their own standard.

The Obama Biden administration supplied thousands of select fire weapons to local police departments all across the country.
But they keep saying “only the military needs machine guns.”

I think a machine gun should hold a place of honor inside every American home.

Similarly, it is absolutely obvious that THE primary intent of the Second Amendment was/is ensuring that We the People remain on equal footing with our government forces (law enforcement, national guard, and military) as a last resort to repel a tyrannical government. That necessarily requires the ability to acquire, own, possess, and use similar arms as law enforcement, national guard, and our military. Oh, and that last bit also applies in case a foreign entity attacks our states and our military is unable or unwilling to repel the attack. Given this obvious intent of the Second Amendment, attorneys should also be able to use this fact to compel the Supremes to overturn the National Firearms Act of 1934.

Most commercial gun ranges ban full auto guns. Why??

The insurance.

And you don’t see the “gun community” supporting the teenage ownership of machine pistols. And you don’t see them supporting the ownership by adults either.

And yes there are teenagers, responsible ones, who could possess machine pistols. But not teenagers raised by single mothers without a father.

I would love to go back to the days when black people could order their machine guns delivered to their homes.

Btw
I’m the one who says that the bump stock is an outstanding low cost rapid-fire weapon for the poor.

But the “gun community” does not support the bump stock.

I think these so-called “rapid-fire triggers” are much more effective than a real machine gun. And they certainly cost a lot less.

The second amendment allows me to mount guns on my bicycle, motorcycle, fishing boat, and private airplane.