Comments on: Mexico’s Lawfare Attack On American Gun Makers Got a Rough Ride in the Supreme Court

By: Dude

Dude — Thu, 06 Mar 2025 15:01:29 +0000

In reply to Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR. Because Democrats don't hate them.

By: Darkman

Darkman — Wed, 05 Mar 2025 18:31:58 +0000

Supreme Court will hear from US gun makers sued by Mexico for $10 billion | AP News
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-mexico-guns-sandy-hook-4a3b726ffd7aabf4eee5d0225dd51769

By: Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR

Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR — Wed, 05 Mar 2025 18:08:42 +0000

In reply to tsbhoa.p.jr. More to the point, why aren't Budweiser and Jack Daniels held liable for drunk driving deaths?

By: .40 cal Booger

.40 cal Booger — Wed, 05 Mar 2025 17:04:42 +0000

BREAKING 2A SCOTUS NEWS: HIGHLIGHTS OF SCOTUS GUN RIGHTS ARGUMENT.

SCOTUS held a major oral argument in Mexico v. Smith & Wesson involving the 2nd Amendment and Mark Smith Four Boxes Diner discusses with recordings from the oral argument in this video.

h ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYWiKH1-fvM

By: tsbhoa.p.jr

tsbhoa.p.jr — Wed, 05 Mar 2025 16:37:41 +0000

In reply to Andrew B. any right thinker sees that as a stand alone. in fact that is what should be being litigated rather than this tripe.

By: Andrew B

Andrew B — Wed, 05 Mar 2025 14:14:46 +0000

If Smith and Wesson is found liable, can we use that as a precedent to likewise indict former President Obama and his Attorney General? They deliberately ran guns to the Mexican cartels, so it isn’t even second-hand like the current allegations.