Comments on: Mexican President Stands Up for Drug Cartels, Threatens More Anti-Gun Lawfare

By: Craig Swartz

Craig Swartz — Fri, 28 Feb 2025 13:48:22 +0000

In reply to Darkman. I agree, but I’m not in favor of risking our men’s lives by sending them into Mexico to rout out the cartels or their weaponry.

By: Craig Swartz

Craig Swartz — Fri, 28 Feb 2025 13:43:55 +0000

The cartels are using real military weapons for the most part, not the semiauto versions available to mainstream Americans without Class III licenses. On top of that, Mexico doesn’t allow its people to legally own much in the way of firearms at all. They should look to their own corrupt government for the reason their cartels are so well-armed, or actually even to why these cartels exist in the first place.

By: Michael Douglas

Michael Douglas — Sun, 23 Feb 2025 03:32:49 +0000

Well, can’t we sue them for hundreds of billion for their part in cartel drugs damages that have been caused to Americans?

By: Dude

Dude — Sat, 22 Feb 2025 17:45:33 +0000

In reply to Chris T in KY. Mexico is the junior partner in this endeavor. China is the senior partner.

By: Chris T in KY

Chris T in KY — Sat, 22 Feb 2025 08:40:21 +0000

The Mexicans are doing exactly what the British were doing 170 years ago in China. Only now its meth and fentanyl. And not opium.

The US should attack Mexico. Just like the Chinese attacked the British for flooding their country with opium.

By: top secret

top secret — Fri, 21 Feb 2025 23:48:26 +0000

It’s becoming more and more apparent that the US is going to have to come in and solve Mexico’s problems for them since they aren’t just letting it happen but encouraging it. Nothing happens there without the cartels’ okay. Armed citizens are bad for business.

By: Dad

Dad — Fri, 21 Feb 2025 22:38:59 +0000

An attack on a cartel is an attack on the Mexican government. Fuck ’em. They chose their bed.

By: JC

JC — Fri, 21 Feb 2025 20:21:19 +0000

I propose we close the border except for 3-4 trade gates heavily policed by ICE and Customs. Extend a no-mans buffer zone 1-5 miles South, on their side, enforced by the US military. All private property to be vacated, completely! The zone should be patrolled by drones, AC-130s and other support aircraft. Any incursions should be destroyed. Guard against SA missiles, cause they will get them. Destroy the launch site. Any reprisal from Mexican authorities or Military should be destroyed. About 90 days of that should change things.

By: Darkman

Darkman — Fri, 21 Feb 2025 19:19:35 +0000

There is a very simple solution for solving the problem of the Mexican government’s refusal to fully cooperate in destroying the Mexican Cartels and ending both the drug and human trafficking that comes from their country. Simple designate it as a state sponsor of terrorism and deal with it as we have with other said governments through the direct use of all military options. I believe President Trump has already made the first steps in that direction by designating the Cartels as terrorist organization and publicly calling out the Mexican government as being under the control of the Cartels. He is giving them the opportunity to prove they truly do want to eliminate the Cartels and the death and destruction they perpetrate on the Mexican people, but that opportunity has a time limit. We now know the CIA has been flying drones over Mexico for at least the last year and possibly longer searching out where the Cartel strongholds are. This is not been happening just for the fun of it and that information has a purpose. Make no mistake President Trump has made the promise to the American people to eliminate the scourge of drugs and human trafficking brought about by the Cartels and as we have seen over the last 31 days. He makes good on his promises.

By: Shire-man

Shire-man — Fri, 21 Feb 2025 18:06:36 +0000

Mexico: “We are not in bed with cartels.”
Also Mexico: “We need a Constitutional amendment to protect cartels.”