<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Gun Industry Asks SCOTUS to Step Into Mexico v. Firearm Makers Lawsuit	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/law/gun-industry-asks-scotus-to-step-into-mexico-v-firearm-makers-lawsuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/law/gun-industry-asks-scotus-to-step-into-mexico-v-firearm-makers-lawsuit/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2024 19:40:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: LampOfDiogenes		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/law/gun-industry-asks-scotus-to-step-into-mexico-v-firearm-makers-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-1883</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LampOfDiogenes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2024 19:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=5790#comment-1883</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t speak for others, but I&#039;ve never once bought a firearm based on ANY advertising.  Advertising is sucker-bait, and people who pay attention to it deserve what they get.  Any person who buys a firearm without a full understanding that they are buying a lethal tool, that requires both training and constant diligence, is a moron who shouldn&#039;t own a firearm in the first place.

But how can anyone seriously suggest that a manufacturer of an (admittedly) lethal tool is somehow responsible for how some random loser misuses the product they manufactured is beyond my comprehension.  Arrest the actual shooter?  Sure.  Seize all his/her assets, for the benefit of the victim(s)?  I&#039;m on board.  

But suggesting that Ruger, or Remington, or S &#038; W, or Winchester, or Palmetto Armory, is somehow responsible is literally insane.  There is NO difference between this suit, and someone suing Ford or GM because some guy drove to a bar in a Ford or GM product, imbibed a snootful, and then drove home and had an accident.  It is objectively stupid.  Lawyers are trained to look for the &quot;deep pocket&quot;, and go for it, but this is ridiculous.

And it is particularly ironic and hypocritical, coming from Mexico.  It doesn&#039;t even deserve a chuckle, let alone a laugh.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t speak for others, but I&#8217;ve never once bought a firearm based on ANY advertising.  Advertising is sucker-bait, and people who pay attention to it deserve what they get.  Any person who buys a firearm without a full understanding that they are buying a lethal tool, that requires both training and constant diligence, is a moron who shouldn&#8217;t own a firearm in the first place.</p>
<p>But how can anyone seriously suggest that a manufacturer of an (admittedly) lethal tool is somehow responsible for how some random loser misuses the product they manufactured is beyond my comprehension.  Arrest the actual shooter?  Sure.  Seize all his/her assets, for the benefit of the victim(s)?  I&#8217;m on board.  </p>
<p>But suggesting that Ruger, or Remington, or S &amp; W, or Winchester, or Palmetto Armory, is somehow responsible is literally insane.  There is NO difference between this suit, and someone suing Ford or GM because some guy drove to a bar in a Ford or GM product, imbibed a snootful, and then drove home and had an accident.  It is objectively stupid.  Lawyers are trained to look for the &#8220;deep pocket&#8221;, and go for it, but this is ridiculous.</p>
<p>And it is particularly ironic and hypocritical, coming from Mexico.  It doesn&#8217;t even deserve a chuckle, let alone a laugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
