I’ve noticed some people wearing shirts with chest pockets and inserting their phones in them backwards with the camera lens peeking out just above the pocket’s top edge, pointing forward. Not a bad idea in a pinch.

The video of the scene showed that Foster leveled his rifle at Perry, and per the video embedded above Foster’s stated intent was to use the rifle to intimidate others — not for self protection. And do not forget, Foster was already breaking the law at the time (unlawful assembly, false imprisonment, etc.)

The top APD detectives investigated and found it was a good shoot (or at least there was more than enough reasonable doubt not to warrant charges). Prior DA similarly did not prosecute. Garza may have violated the law by withholding that testimony from the grand jury.

Speaking of low IQ drones whipped into a frenzy by Lefties over a lie about racism…Recall me mentioning the attacks on churches in Canada the other day? This two minute video that dropped yesterday explains it. Why would anyone still trust the MSM? They’ve been caught lying about every major story of the past eight years.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pXAVyD9JmQ

That wasn’t just someone open carrying. The context was an angry mob surrounding and attacking his car. Aggressive, wannabe intimidator AK bandit guy was with the mob. He was obviously in fear of his life. This was a mob of low IQ drones whipped into a frenzy by Democrats because of “racism.”

Every single influential person that supported the George Floyd lie is responsible for this death and dozens of others. People had to die so they could mobilize the low IQ crowd to show up and vote for a senile puppet. None of them lost a second of sleep over it.

Here was Perry’s problem: he talked to police and this is what he said: “”I believe he was going to aim it at me … I didn’t want to give him a chance to aim at me, you know.” Lethal force is only justified if you are in imminent danger of great bodily harm or death. Imminent. Someone open carrying a rifle does not put anyone in imminent danger.

I believe this article answers my question: https://www.texastribune.org/2021/07/01/garrett-foster-indicted-murder-daniel-perry-austin-protester/
The dead person was legally open carrying a rifle and there was a factual dispute about who aimed first. To me this case is a good reminder that you must be in fear of imminent great bodily injury or death before you shoot someone who is carrying a gun–and you better have witnesses on your side.

I’m confused. Wasn’t the dead person aiming a rifle at the Srgt. Perry? What was the prosecutor’s legal argument that shooting a person aiming a rifle at you is a homicide? I understand that shooting someone meeting the elements of the crime of murder but isn’t there a slam dunk self defense argument? What happened?

Liberal/progressive democrat prosecutor in a heavily democrat city in fear of BLM reprisals unless they convicted him. nuff said.

Thanks for the explanation. It sounds like he did this right, and other people were dragging their feet.