Comments on: BREAKING: Most of Mexico’s Lawfare Suit Against US Gunmakers Dismissed…Again https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/law/breaking-most-of-mexicos-lawfare-suit-against-us-gunmakers-dismissed-again/ Thu, 08 Aug 2024 13:48:53 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 By: Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/law/breaking-most-of-mexicos-lawfare-suit-against-us-gunmakers-dismissed-again/comment-page-1/#comment-7601 Thu, 08 Aug 2024 13:48:53 +0000 https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=10614#comment-7601 In reply to Mark N..

Thanks, it would have been nice if that was included…

]]> By: JC https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/law/breaking-most-of-mexicos-lawfare-suit-against-us-gunmakers-dismissed-again/comment-page-1/#comment-7582 Thu, 08 Aug 2024 00:19:18 +0000 https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=10614#comment-7582 This whole thing should be dismissed and the lawyers ……………….. and Mex gov to pay…………………I’m pissed.

]]> By: Mark N. https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/law/breaking-most-of-mexicos-lawfare-suit-against-us-gunmakers-dismissed-again/comment-page-1/#comment-7576 Wed, 07 Aug 2024 22:46:29 +0000 https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=10614#comment-7576 In reply to Geoff PR.

Nothing got stayed. Just some of the defendants were dismissed from the case by the trial court on jurisdictional grounds (the nature of which grounds are not explained by the short article here).

]]> By: Geoff PR https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/law/breaking-most-of-mexicos-lawfare-suit-against-us-gunmakers-dismissed-again/comment-page-1/#comment-7571 Wed, 07 Aug 2024 21:16:37 +0000 https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=10614#comment-7571 Most, but not all?

What part stayed?

]]> By: Dad https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/law/breaking-most-of-mexicos-lawfare-suit-against-us-gunmakers-dismissed-again/comment-page-1/#comment-7569 Wed, 07 Aug 2024 20:33:13 +0000 https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=10614#comment-7569 Saylor also okayed the MA AWB, so don’t think of him as a protector of rights.

]]>