<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: BREAKING: Federal Court Strikes Down Illinois &#8216;Assault Weapon&#8217; and Magazine Bans	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/law/breaking-federal-court-strikes-down-illinois-assault-weapon-and-magazine-bans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/law/breaking-federal-court-strikes-down-illinois-assault-weapon-and-magazine-bans/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2024 12:07:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: .40 cal Booger		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/law/breaking-federal-court-strikes-down-illinois-assault-weapon-and-magazine-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-11739</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[.40 cal Booger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2024 09:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=14828#comment-11739</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/law/breaking-federal-court-strikes-down-illinois-assault-weapon-and-magazine-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-11723&quot;&gt;Dad&lt;/a&gt;.

That &#039;in common use for self defense&#039; is the thing the anti-gun started sneaking into cases a couple of years ago. It is blatantly wrong, as you said, Bruen said nothing about the common use for self defense, they said “in common use for all lawful purposes including self defense”. Its one of those &#039;cracks&#039; anti-gun created and are trying to exploit and &#039;muddy the water&#039; with because &#039;self-defense&#039; is frequently bought up by the pro-gun side as A use but not the only use.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/law/breaking-federal-court-strikes-down-illinois-assault-weapon-and-magazine-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-11723">Dad</a>.</p>
<p>That &#8216;in common use for self defense&#8217; is the thing the anti-gun started sneaking into cases a couple of years ago. It is blatantly wrong, as you said, Bruen said nothing about the common use for self defense, they said “in common use for all lawful purposes including self defense”. Its one of those &#8216;cracks&#8217; anti-gun created and are trying to exploit and &#8216;muddy the water&#8217; with because &#8216;self-defense&#8217; is frequently bought up by the pro-gun side as A use but not the only use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dad		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/law/breaking-federal-court-strikes-down-illinois-assault-weapon-and-magazine-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-11723</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2024 05:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=14828#comment-11723</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[But nothing changes. The injunction is on hold for 30 days for the state to appeal, and the 7th Circuit is guaranteed to rule against the judgement. Wat concerns me is the McGlynn ruled that .50 caliber rifles and ammo can be banned, since they&#039;re &quot;not in common use for self defense&quot;. Bruen said nothing about the common use for self defense, they said &quot;in common use for all lawful purposes including self defense&quot;. McGlynn fucked up big time on that one. Words matter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But nothing changes. The injunction is on hold for 30 days for the state to appeal, and the 7th Circuit is guaranteed to rule against the judgement. Wat concerns me is the McGlynn ruled that .50 caliber rifles and ammo can be banned, since they&#8217;re &#8220;not in common use for self defense&#8221;. Bruen said nothing about the common use for self defense, they said &#8220;in common use for all lawful purposes including self defense&#8221;. McGlynn fucked up big time on that one. Words matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/law/breaking-federal-court-strikes-down-illinois-assault-weapon-and-magazine-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-11710</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2024 00:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=14828#comment-11710</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Best of luck to those in Illinois.

In sober international news, Pogroms have returned to Amsterdam.  Let&#039;s see how the Dutch respond to their new Arab &#039;immigrants&#039; :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIozOTSfxiM]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best of luck to those in Illinois.</p>
<p>In sober international news, Pogroms have returned to Amsterdam.  Let&#8217;s see how the Dutch respond to their new Arab &#8216;immigrants&#8217; :</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIozOTSfxiM" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIozOTSfxiM</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
