Comments on: A Couple of 2A Legal Setbacks, But the Long View Is Still Promising

By: LKB

LKB — Mon, 26 Aug 2024 23:58:43 +0000

Goofball decision by the district court; relying primarily on a DISTRICT court decision (Rupp v. Bonta) that similarly ignored Bruen and is almost certain to be reversed.

“Forget it Jake. It’s Californiatown.”

By: .40 cal Booger

.40 cal Booger — Mon, 26 Aug 2024 15:54:55 +0000

In reply to .40 cal Booger.

Don’t fall for the ‘not arms’ of ‘not in common use’ arguments. They are false arguments playing on wording not being specifically spelled out in the 2A. ANYTHING can be ‘arms’ and is ‘in common use’ if it can be used for self defense.

Do we now also point to the first amendment to say computer use to express speech by the news media is not covered by the first amendment because the 1st doesn’t have text that specifically mentions computers as being in common use and a means to express speech?

By: .40 cal Booger

.40 cal Booger — Mon, 26 Aug 2024 15:45:47 +0000

“There’s no mention of ‘self defense’ or ‘in common use’ in the plain text of the Second Amendment.”

Hmmmm…not in those specific words but its there by use of the word ‘arms’ which means, in Bruen and other SCOTUS cases, basically ANYTHING a person may or can use for defense…a definition from which are derived the ‘common use’ and ‘self defense’ terms in Bruen and other SCOTUS cases.

By: Darkman

Darkman — Mon, 26 Aug 2024 15:08:37 +0000

When you choose to live in a tyrannical state ot nation you can’t expect to have freedom. That’s why 1000s of people risked life and limb to escape East Germany before the Wall came down. Escaping Commiefornia is a much easier proposition all it requires is to do so. Nothing is keeping you there except your own choices.