There is nothing linking these guns or rational to suggest using them over any others.

The article could have just as well said:
Glock 22, 19, 30, GP100, LCP Max, CZ75, M&P Shield

Or
SP101, Taurus G3C/G3/G3X, Glock 20sf, XD9’s, Ruger Redhawk Alaskan

Or
Bersa Thunder, Makarov, S&W 686, SR22, Sig P365

Or
Max-9, LCRx, Security 9 compact, Security six, Blackhawk (the Ruger fans)

Or
Hi-Point 9, SCCY 9, Heritage barkeep, Kel-Tec P17, Lorcin .380 (for poor people)

I find the level stupidity, from both the writers and the commenters, entertaining.

If I were you, I’d teach SNW a lesson and no longer read the site…

Thus, why I called it a worthless filler.

That might be fine if you don’t have kids living with you. There’s at least one documented case of a father taking a shot at a shadowy figure coming into his house in the middle of the night. It was his teen daughter who sneaked out earlier. She got shot, but survived.

I keep a small light on in the middle of the house at night, but I still feel better with a WML on the HD pistol and carbine.

“Ms. Ainsworth is receiving money from the manufacturers of the described weapons.”

That’s kinda rude. 🙁

Besides, that Glock looks like it has had some serious use on it…

You’re missing the point of the whole article. Ms. Ainsworth is receiving money from the manufacturers of the described weapons. This article is nothing more than an advertisement.

Excludes the G48 because it’s 0.75 in longer making it more difficult to conceal that a 43x….then turns around and recommend a full sized 1911 that is 2.17 in longer, 0.25 in wider, and weighs 20 oz more than the 43x….and adds “Yes, you can conceal a full-size handgun. Lots of people do it every day…”

This whole damn thing could have been done in one sentence.

“Any compact handgun used for CCW will also serve well for home defense. As will many shotguns, ARs, and PPCs.”

If it’s in my house I know the target and whats beyond.