Since the people who claim to be sovereign citizens don’t recognise the government as having any lawful authority over them, or laws as applying to them, it IS reasonable to see them as having a higher risk factor.

However my main question is; do ‘soverign citizens’ have licences for their firearms? How do they reconcile that with their position? If they do, fine. If they don’t have a licence, prosecute them!

Paul Compton

There are only a few Australians who value freedom and liberty (they look at you blankly as if you are from another planet if you mention them). The rest just want to be told what to do and have the warders provide what they need.
A country with not too many people, vast space and resources, no large native population, people who used to be reasonably well educated and it has been stuffed up beyond belief. Australians should all be filthy rich but belief in government and sloth has led to the present disaster.

Look up the recent changes to their gun laws. They also have a State Constitution which allows them to grab you, hold you down and inject you with any vaccine the government mandates amongst other things. While the Federal gov in Australia must give fair compensation for property seized by it (there are ways around that too like restrictions on farm use without compensation), the States are under no such requirement. In Australian States, the Police actually make most of gun laws which are rubber stamped by the politicians.
This is penalising people for thought crime.
I did most of my education including university in Western Australia. Still live in Australia but another State.

Geoff,

Welcome to Amerikkka, if an Obama wanna-be beats J.D. Vance in ’28. They want us all DED.

Something tells me what constitutes ‘sovereign citizen ideologies’ will be rather flexible, and expand over time, depending on the totalitarian in charge…