Under Roberts, SCOTUS doesn’t exist to protect the People’s individual and Constitutional rights. Its job is to protect the interests of the government and maintain order. Face it, the Court doesn’t like the 2A. They view it as an embarrassing anachronism that is unnecessary in a modern country and they don’t trust ordinary folks having the wrong kind of guns.

If the Court ever takes up any of these cases you can be sure Roberts will find a way to declare bans and licensing schemes to be Constitutional.

I scroll right through them, don’t bother reading. He’s a royal pain in the ass.

“The myth of the inherent goodness of American school teachers is perhaps my least favorite of all the money-grabbing nonsense that gets fed to us by grifters. I write that as someone who has a lot of teachers in his family and circle of friends. There are a lot of good teachers out there, some of them are even great and can have a huge impact on children’s lives. The myth, however, is that all teachers are saints who toil away for slave wages as they ever-so-graciously guide our children through life. It’s an utter garbage assertion, especially when talking about public school teachers who belong to a union.
…
Teachers’ unions are evil. They’re not at all interested in the education of American kids, they’re political lobbies solely focused getting more money for themselves. Money that will not have anything to do with education. The unions completely outed themselves during the COVID pandemic, when they vigorously fought to keep schools closed long after science and most of the American people thought that they should be opened.

Rather than prioritize the needs of the students, the union teachers did what they always do, demand more money. During COVID, they added embarrassing amounts of drama, taking to the streets in protest and insisting that their lives were in peril if they returned to the classrooms (that’s depicted in the feature image for this column). They had no worries about being in protest crowds, though.
…
This is from a New York Post article earlier this week:

And with the strike set to drag into a Wednesday, local parents are now fuming after teachers emailed them and asked them not to encourage any home study.

The district — which says it could lose millions in funding each day the strike goes on — offered homework packets that include ‘five days of independent study work and practice in both English Language Arts and in Math,’ according to its website.

But teachers claim in messages they sent to parents that the packets were a ploy to ensure the district continues to receive funds during the strike, meaning the district would be able to avoid caving to the union’s demands.

‘If many families participate in independent study, it reduces pressure on the district and can prolong the strike,’ read a screenshot shared on social media. ‘If you are able, we ask that you do not participate in the independent study provided by the district.’
…”

ht* tps://pjmedia.com/stephen-kruiser/2026/02/12/burn-it-all-down-sf-teachers-tell-parents-not-to-let-kids-to-study-at-home-during-strike-n4949378

far, far too many. troll feeding is futile. encouragement is not recommended.

[note: lets get this straight. Walz and Frey incited left wing morons to ‘domestic terrorism’ levels against ICE and endorsed and facilitated it and those people did the damage and not the federal government, and some businesses decided to shut down to protest ICE, and now Tim Walz wants the tax payers to pay for it by giving these businesses $10M. The scams never quit in Minnesota. The ‘condition’ to be met is that a business must show they lost revenue as a result of willingly shutting down to protest ICE or were damaged by the Walz/Frey incited and endorsed and facilitated ‘domestic terrorism’. In other words, since 100% of these will be able to show some loss in revenue they meet the condition so Walz wants the tax payers to gift these (collectively) $10M because Waltz and Frey incited and endorsed and facilitated ‘domestic terrorism’ and businesses to shut down to protest ICE.]

ht* tps://townhall.com/tipsheet/scott-mcclallen/2026/02/12/tim-walz-wants-taxpayers-to-give-10m-forgivable-loans-to-businesses-n2671241

“Democrats are allergic to context, which is why they repeatedly offer microwaved interpretations of passages from a book they actually hate.
…”

[note: How many times have you seen me tell Miner49er he does not understand context and needs to learn what context means? Its because he doesn’t and its obvious in his unhinged spewing, leftists do not understand context and its an inherent blank spot in their logic and thought processes with them and they do not realize it as they spew their unhinged confirmation bias.]

ht* tps://thefederalist.com/2026/02/12/leftists-invoking-jesus-to-mutilate-kids-and-defend-rapists-heap-judgment-on-themselves/

White Liberals Think Black Voters, Married Women Are Too Stupid To Get Voter ID.

ht* tps://thefederalist.com/2026/02/12/white-liberals-think-black-voters-married-women-are-too-stupid-to-get-voter-id/

ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9iUgfv5QMQ

“Are politicians really suggesting that women can’t handle getting an ID?

That’s the implication behind one of the loudest arguments against the SAVE Act. We’re told that requiring proof of citizenship will somehow ‘disenfranchise married women’ because of name changes.

But let’s think about that for a second.

Women run businesses. Women serve in Congress. Women raise families, manage finances, buy homes, fly across the country, purchase firearms, get jobs, collect benefits, and handle mountains of paperwork every day.

And we’re supposed to believe they can’t figure out how to obtain or update an ID?

In this video, we break down:
• What the SAVE Act actually requires
• How name changes are legally documented
• Whether the “married women” argument holds up
• Why proof of citizenship is being framed as controversial
• And what this debate really says about how politicians view voters

This isn’t about insulting women. It’s about questioning a narrative that treats them like they’re incapable of handling basic life responsibilities.

Federal elections are for U.S. citizens.
So why is that suddenly radical?”

ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yhj5k8vnafA

ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3IyhveSQ_k