Chris, he actually violated the defamation laws. Now you may argue that those laws should not exist….but clearly they do exist. He knew that the parents were not “crisis actors” yet he continued to claim that they were. They then experienced harm as a result of these lies.

This has nothing to do with the first amendment. It wasn’t simply unpopular speach it was untruthful speach which actually harmed others. They were able to prove in court that he knew his speach was untruthful and as a result he was found liable of violating the law.

He would have been within his rights to say all sorts of nasty things about those unfortunate parents but when he bagan to intentionally lie about them and damage them, that is when it violated the law.

It’s not illegal to be a loudmouth jackass. All he was doing was asking questions, questions that the powers that be didn’t want the answers to come out. He’s been right about a lot of things.

Hey, Shire-man!!

If the adjective ‘obsolete’ is meant to modify the noun ‘playbook’, no problem. But if the adjective ‘obsolete’ is meant to modify the noun ‘Boomer’, I object!!! 🙂

drink bleach pinko

It will be far easier to eliminate the first amendment if you act quickly, after a crisis has occurred.

It also helps if you are selective, as to whose speech you will support, and whose speech you will not support.

For example when congress woman maxine waters publicly said that trump supporters should be confronted in restaurants, and made to feel uncomfortable.

The libertarians liberals and leftists were quiet as a church mouse when she that.

But if it was a Christian pastor who said that H0.m”0se.zu@ls should be made to feel uncomfortable in public. I would have seen over 200 well-written opinion pieces condemning this person. As a response.

Alex jones was and still is an effective speaker against government corruption. Even when the government stole his private company from him. Even though he violated no law.

And of course, the media is not complaining about what happened to Alex jones. Because Alex Jones is their competition. And they’re quite happy to see the government destroy their competition.

The media does not support the first amendment. But they do support having their competition destroyed.

It will be far easier to eliminate the first amendment if you act quickly, after a crisis has occurred.

It also helps if you are selective, as to whose speech you will support, and whose speech you will not support.

For example when congress woman maxine waters publicly said that trump supporters should be confronted in restaurants, and made to feel uncomfortable.

The libertarians liberals and leftists were quiet as a church mouse when she that.

But if it was a Christian pastor who said that Homosexuals should be made to feel uncomfortable in public. I would have seen over 200 well-written opinion pieces condemning this person. As a response.

Alex jones was and still is an effective speaker against government corruption. Even when the government stole his private company from him. Even though he violated no law.

And of course, the media is not complaining about what happened to Alex jones. Because Alex Jones is their competition. And they’re quite happy to see the government destroy their competition.

The media does not support the first amendment. But they do support having their competition destroyed.