<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Smith &#038; Wesson Response: A (Mostly) Polymer PCC	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-review/the-smith-wesson-response-a-mostly-polymer-pcc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-review/the-smith-wesson-response-a-mostly-polymer-pcc/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2024 04:30:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: LampofDiogenes		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-review/the-smith-wesson-response-a-mostly-polymer-pcc/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LampofDiogenes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2024 04:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=2708#comment-115</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Travis,

Overall, I like the looks (and description) of this firearm (and I think I like its FPC version better), but (and isn&#039;t there always a big &quot;BUT&quot;?) I&#039;ve already got my Kel-Tec Sub2000 (and spent the difference between its MSRP and this one&#039;s, and a lot of hours, installing a full M-CARBO upgrade kit) so I&#039;m not inclined to change.  My primary purpose for the Sub2000 was for my truck bag/bug-out bag, and it does the job nicely (now), so I&#039;ll pass, but I&#039;m glad the manufacturers are beginning to innovate.  Kel-Tec innovates like crazy on design; I wish they would get their poop in a pile on quality control!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Travis,</p>
<p>Overall, I like the looks (and description) of this firearm (and I think I like its FPC version better), but (and isn&#8217;t there always a big &#8220;BUT&#8221;?) I&#8217;ve already got my Kel-Tec Sub2000 (and spent the difference between its MSRP and this one&#8217;s, and a lot of hours, installing a full M-CARBO upgrade kit) so I&#8217;m not inclined to change.  My primary purpose for the Sub2000 was for my truck bag/bug-out bag, and it does the job nicely (now), so I&#8217;ll pass, but I&#8217;m glad the manufacturers are beginning to innovate.  Kel-Tec innovates like crazy on design; I wish they would get their poop in a pile on quality control!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
