Comments on: Optic Review: Leupold Mark 3HD 1.5-4×20 Rifle Scope With FireDot BDC Reticle https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-news/optic-review-leupold-mark-3hd-1-5-4x20-rifle-scope-with-firedot-bdc-reticle/ Thu, 07 Mar 2024 03:35:27 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 By: I Haz A Question https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-news/optic-review-leupold-mark-3hd-1-5-4x20-rifle-scope-with-firedot-bdc-reticle/comment-page-1/#comment-583 Thu, 07 Mar 2024 03:35:27 +0000 https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=3730#comment-583 The only glass I have on my long range items is Leupold. Even my spotting scope.

]]> By: uncommon_sense https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-news/optic-review-leupold-mark-3hd-1-5-4x20-rifle-scope-with-firedot-bdc-reticle/comment-page-1/#comment-566 Wed, 06 Mar 2024 12:21:49 +0000 https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=3730#comment-566 As this article states, if you want a sighting system which works REALLY well for ranges between 2 and 200 yards, low power variable optics really are the optimum choice in my opinion.

My only quibble is that this Leupold low power variable optic only goes down to 1.5x magnification–I want it to go all the way down to 1x magnification (which is no magnification at all). I don’t know why Leupold did that. I have a Nikon low power variable optic scope which goes all the way down to 1x magnification and it is FANTASTIC being able to keep both eyes open and seeing the same image in both eyes for close shots. I know that this article says that you can do that at 1.5x magnification: I would have to see that before I would believe that it would not be problematic.

]]>