<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Hi-Point Announces 3 New Brace-Ready Pistol Models	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-news/hi-point-announces-3-new-brace-ready-pistol-models/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-news/hi-point-announces-3-new-brace-ready-pistol-models/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 01:27:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dad		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-news/hi-point-announces-3-new-brace-ready-pistol-models/comment-page-1/#comment-10752</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 01:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=14169#comment-10752</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[No. Just….. no. Raving reviews though. Wonder who wrote it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. Just….. no. Raving reviews though. Wonder who wrote it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SAFEupstateFML		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-news/hi-point-announces-3-new-brace-ready-pistol-models/comment-page-1/#comment-10735</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAFEupstateFML]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 20:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=14169#comment-10735</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How did hipoint put together the majority of what I am looking for in a larger 10mm pistol (sorta)?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did hipoint put together the majority of what I am looking for in a larger 10mm pistol (sorta)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PDWS		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-news/hi-point-announces-3-new-brace-ready-pistol-models/comment-page-1/#comment-10734</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PDWS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 19:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=14169#comment-10734</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-news/hi-point-announces-3-new-brace-ready-pistol-models/comment-page-1/#comment-10732&quot;&gt;10mmForLife&lt;/a&gt;.

I saw a picture of the carbine after I posted, and had a similar thought.  I don&#039;t own one, but it seems from this:  https://everygunpart.com/long-guns-kits/hi-point-995-semi-auto-evguf3-vwhd-00.html that the telescoping bolt ends at the front of the &quot;upper&quot; (which is just a cheesy sheetmetal cover), and the rest is just superfluous plastic.  Even if I&#039;m missing something, it seems like it would have made much more sense to start with their pistols and add some sort of chassis.  I can&#039;t imagine anyone wanting to forego the advantages of a real stock just to save two Fn inches.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-news/hi-point-announces-3-new-brace-ready-pistol-models/comment-page-1/#comment-10732">10mmForLife</a>.</p>
<p>I saw a picture of the carbine after I posted, and had a similar thought.  I don&#8217;t own one, but it seems from this:  <a href="https://everygunpart.com/long-guns-kits/hi-point-995-semi-auto-evguf3-vwhd-00.html" rel="nofollow ugc">https://everygunpart.com/long-guns-kits/hi-point-995-semi-auto-evguf3-vwhd-00.html</a> that the telescoping bolt ends at the front of the &#8220;upper&#8221; (which is just a cheesy sheetmetal cover), and the rest is just superfluous plastic.  Even if I&#8217;m missing something, it seems like it would have made much more sense to start with their pistols and add some sort of chassis.  I can&#8217;t imagine anyone wanting to forego the advantages of a real stock just to save two Fn inches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: 10mmForLife		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-news/hi-point-announces-3-new-brace-ready-pistol-models/comment-page-1/#comment-10732</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[10mmForLife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 19:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=14169#comment-10732</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-news/hi-point-announces-3-new-brace-ready-pistol-models/comment-page-1/#comment-10728&quot;&gt;PDWS&lt;/a&gt;.

Just guessing here, but these look a lot like their respective carbines.  I&#039;d bet the barrel is the shortest that the carbine upper could handle, without having to redesign the upper.  Look at the 995, it has about 3&quot; of barrel sticking forward out of the front of the upper, and on the 995P, the front sight is tucked in as close to the upper as it can get.

I&#039;m with you, I&#039;d much rather have an 8&quot; or 9&quot; barrel on the 4595P, but that would have meant redesigning the whole front of the gun, and I&#039;m thinking they didn&#039;t want to go through that effort when they could make a &quot;pistol&quot; just by chopping off the stock and shortening up the barrel as much as they could.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-news/hi-point-announces-3-new-brace-ready-pistol-models/comment-page-1/#comment-10728">PDWS</a>.</p>
<p>Just guessing here, but these look a lot like their respective carbines.  I&#8217;d bet the barrel is the shortest that the carbine upper could handle, without having to redesign the upper.  Look at the 995, it has about 3&#8243; of barrel sticking forward out of the front of the upper, and on the 995P, the front sight is tucked in as close to the upper as it can get.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you, I&#8217;d much rather have an 8&#8243; or 9&#8243; barrel on the 4595P, but that would have meant redesigning the whole front of the gun, and I&#8217;m thinking they didn&#8217;t want to go through that effort when they could make a &#8220;pistol&#8221; just by chopping off the stock and shortening up the barrel as much as they could.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PDWS		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-news/hi-point-announces-3-new-brace-ready-pistol-models/comment-page-1/#comment-10728</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PDWS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 18:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=14169#comment-10728</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A company that makes rifles and pistols realizes that some shooters like benefitting from more points of contact than a pistol without going up to rifle size - especially with a suppressor.  Why TF would their entry into that market use carbine-length barrels for pistol cartridges?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A company that makes rifles and pistols realizes that some shooters like benefitting from more points of contact than a pistol without going up to rifle size &#8211; especially with a suppressor.  Why TF would their entry into that market use carbine-length barrels for pistol cartridges?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
