Comments on: Justices Struggled to Determine What Comprises a Gun in VanDerStok Arguments https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-nation/justices-struggled-to-determine-what-comprises-a-gun-in-vanderstok-arguments/ Thu, 10 Oct 2024 20:10:16 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 By: DinWA https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-nation/justices-struggled-to-determine-what-comprises-a-gun-in-vanderstok-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-10173 Thu, 10 Oct 2024 20:10:16 +0000 https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=13674#comment-10173 Better get your 0% receivers now; they’re already illegal in Cali.

Though I’m sure you could order some bar stock and cut it yourself.

]]> By: 9Volt https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-nation/justices-struggled-to-determine-what-comprises-a-gun-in-vanderstok-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-10168 Thu, 10 Oct 2024 15:24:18 +0000 https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=13674#comment-10168 “…when a partly assembled gun may be considered a firearm under the law and how much work qualifies as “readily converted.”

The GG-3S CNC machine can make the ‘numbered part’ out of solid blocks of aluminum.
There was a video on the Y-Tube years ago that showed an individual making a mold of an AR-15 lower in sand, melding down aluminum cans to pour into it, and then machining out the rest of it.
I’m not going to comment on the…durability(?)…of it but years ago there was ‘AR-15 Mold’ where one mixed & poured their own lower. I think they had issues of the back half snapping where the buffer tube attached. That said, a more viable option would be if one could create a Glock 17/19 pour mold.

]]>