<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Is the 1911 Really Still a Viable Choice for Everyday Carry in 2025	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-nation/is-the-1911-really-still-a-viable-choice-for-everyday-carry-in-2025/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-nation/is-the-1911-really-still-a-viable-choice-for-everyday-carry-in-2025/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:09:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeffro		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-nation/is-the-1911-really-still-a-viable-choice-for-everyday-carry-in-2025/comment-page-1/#comment-85983</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=28665#comment-85983</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Stupid places, stupid times, stupid things, stupid people. I avoid these things like the plague. I also practice situational awareness. If I&#039;m driving, I have an out. Even if it is over a curb. I carry a Commander sized 1911 every day, two spare mags. 

I have carried a Hi-Power. I may do so again. Also with two spare mags. I may, or may not carry a S&#038;W 586 with two moonclips in moon pouches from Jeffrey&#039;s Custom Leather. 

There may, or may not be a PCC with three 32 round mags in the car, accessible from the drivers seat. Illegal in a lot of jurisdictions. I don&#039;t give the LEO&#039;s a reason to give me a second look. 

A good belt, not some cheap Wally World special, and a quality holster. I use Milt Sparks and TT Gunleather. I&#039;m closer to 70 than I am 60. I don&#039;t mind the weight. 

Mind over matter. If you don&#039;t mind, it don&#039;t matter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stupid places, stupid times, stupid things, stupid people. I avoid these things like the plague. I also practice situational awareness. If I&#8217;m driving, I have an out. Even if it is over a curb. I carry a Commander sized 1911 every day, two spare mags. </p>
<p>I have carried a Hi-Power. I may do so again. Also with two spare mags. I may, or may not carry a S&amp;W 586 with two moonclips in moon pouches from Jeffrey&#8217;s Custom Leather. </p>
<p>There may, or may not be a PCC with three 32 round mags in the car, accessible from the drivers seat. Illegal in a lot of jurisdictions. I don&#8217;t give the LEO&#8217;s a reason to give me a second look. </p>
<p>A good belt, not some cheap Wally World special, and a quality holster. I use Milt Sparks and TT Gunleather. I&#8217;m closer to 70 than I am 60. I don&#8217;t mind the weight. </p>
<p>Mind over matter. If you don&#8217;t mind, it don&#8217;t matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dude		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-nation/is-the-1911-really-still-a-viable-choice-for-everyday-carry-in-2025/comment-page-1/#comment-85109</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 20:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=28665#comment-85109</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have a 1911 with an aluminum frame that makes it easier to carry if need be.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a 1911 with an aluminum frame that makes it easier to carry if need be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris T in KY		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-nation/is-the-1911-really-still-a-viable-choice-for-everyday-carry-in-2025/comment-page-1/#comment-85016</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris T in KY]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 17:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=28665#comment-85016</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A 7 or 9 capacity for a semi-automatic handgun. That weighs over 32 oz in the 21st century, as a carry gun. I think is obsolete. 

And what about a 5 or 6 shot revolver? 

Most don&#039;t weigh 32 oz. In fact my SW Model 36 from the 1960s is less than 20 oz.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 7 or 9 capacity for a semi-automatic handgun. That weighs over 32 oz in the 21st century, as a carry gun. I think is obsolete. </p>
<p>And what about a 5 or 6 shot revolver? </p>
<p>Most don&#8217;t weigh 32 oz. In fact my SW Model 36 from the 1960s is less than 20 oz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Shire-man		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-nation/is-the-1911-really-still-a-viable-choice-for-everyday-carry-in-2025/comment-page-1/#comment-84966</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shire-man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 16:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=28665#comment-84966</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Seems like after last week everybody should be carrying a PDW in .300 and 8 mags of supers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like after last week everybody should be carrying a PDW in .300 and 8 mags of supers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: .40 cal Booger		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-nation/is-the-1911-really-still-a-viable-choice-for-everyday-carry-in-2025/comment-page-1/#comment-84964</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[.40 cal Booger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 16:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=28665#comment-84964</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Is the 1911 Really Still a Viable Choice for Everyday Carry in 2025&quot;

No, not with 7 round mags.

We have moved from the &#039;common criminal&#039; one or two perpetrators thing. Today its becoming frequent for 3, 4, 5, heck 15-20 attackers at once. Haw fast can you reload when the attackers are right there in arms reach and closing? How effective will six rounds in a revolver be if there are more than 6 attackers closing or a 7 round .45 mag be if there are more then t attackers closing that are dedicated and will not stop unless you stop them cold, when you account for any misses or wounding that does not stop and motions when those attackers are closing and suddenly you need to reload when they are right there at arms reach? Ya think they are going to go &quot;Oh, ok, you reload, we&#039;ll wait&#039;? How about the thousands of screaming mentally ill leftist cult fanatics on line that have in their imaginations tagged &#039;you&#039; (as in any &#039;conservative&#039;), as their enemy and want to roam in mobs looking for targets of their irrational mental illness fanatical hatred willing to die for their imagined cause, ya think they are gonna stop every time you need to reload that six shot revolver or that 7 round mag .45? 

You need to be able to sustain fire with a minimum of reload interruptions - at very close range that&#039;s not going to give you time to reload a six shot revolver or a 7 round mag for a .45 .]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Is the 1911 Really Still a Viable Choice for Everyday Carry in 2025&#8221;</p>
<p>No, not with 7 round mags.</p>
<p>We have moved from the &#8216;common criminal&#8217; one or two perpetrators thing. Today its becoming frequent for 3, 4, 5, heck 15-20 attackers at once. Haw fast can you reload when the attackers are right there in arms reach and closing? How effective will six rounds in a revolver be if there are more than 6 attackers closing or a 7 round .45 mag be if there are more then t attackers closing that are dedicated and will not stop unless you stop them cold, when you account for any misses or wounding that does not stop and motions when those attackers are closing and suddenly you need to reload when they are right there at arms reach? Ya think they are going to go &#8220;Oh, ok, you reload, we&#8217;ll wait&#8217;? How about the thousands of screaming mentally ill leftist cult fanatics on line that have in their imaginations tagged &#8216;you&#8217; (as in any &#8216;conservative&#8217;), as their enemy and want to roam in mobs looking for targets of their irrational mental illness fanatical hatred willing to die for their imagined cause, ya think they are gonna stop every time you need to reload that six shot revolver or that 7 round mag .45? </p>
<p>You need to be able to sustain fire with a minimum of reload interruptions &#8211; at very close range that&#8217;s not going to give you time to reload a six shot revolver or a 7 round mag for a .45 .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris T in KY		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-nation/is-the-1911-really-still-a-viable-choice-for-everyday-carry-in-2025/comment-page-1/#comment-84934</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris T in KY]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 15:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=28665#comment-84934</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Weight is everything when you carry a gun. Concealed or not. I carried a rifle and a sidearm while in the Army. It was my duty. So I put with all in inconveniences.  And made the best of it. 

You don&#039;t have to do this as a civilian. If you&#039;re gonna buy a gun with intention of carrying it, then you really need to consider the size and weight. And you need to consider the type of job you have, as well as the type of clothing you already have. 

A 1911 is very difficult to conceal because of its size. If you are wearing office business attire? I don&#039;t think a 1911 is going to work out for you. A business woman wearing a dress is going to have a difficult time concealing a 1911.

And the &quot;gun community&quot; does not spend a lot of time addressing the issues of female gun owners when it comes to what they&#039;re going to wear to conceal their weapon. 

And females are the largest subgroup of new gun buyers. A self employed person can carry whatever they want. 

And most gun owners are not self employed. If you are self employed you can carry whatever you want.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weight is everything when you carry a gun. Concealed or not. I carried a rifle and a sidearm while in the Army. It was my duty. So I put with all in inconveniences.  And made the best of it. </p>
<p>You don&#8217;t have to do this as a civilian. If you&#8217;re gonna buy a gun with intention of carrying it, then you really need to consider the size and weight. And you need to consider the type of job you have, as well as the type of clothing you already have. </p>
<p>A 1911 is very difficult to conceal because of its size. If you are wearing office business attire? I don&#8217;t think a 1911 is going to work out for you. A business woman wearing a dress is going to have a difficult time concealing a 1911.</p>
<p>And the &#8220;gun community&#8221; does not spend a lot of time addressing the issues of female gun owners when it comes to what they&#8217;re going to wear to conceal their weapon. </p>
<p>And females are the largest subgroup of new gun buyers. A self employed person can carry whatever they want. </p>
<p>And most gun owners are not self employed. If you are self employed you can carry whatever you want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
