dude, bonita brags pretty often about his anti gun efforts. in this case bonita isn’t the one bringing the lawsuit so it’s understandable he wouldn’t brag. plus bragging would just give free extra publicity to the plaintiff. bigger picture the ag must generally defend existing state whether he agrees with it or not. obviously in this case he agrees with the existing unlawful statute. but the legal issue isn’t his best gun control argument and he knows he’ll lose some rounds in the fight so he’s keeping his head down on this case. of course if he wins a round you can be sure bonita will brag then!

“You are correct. It looks silly in a high profile case like this but that’s standard federal civil practice.”

‘If the law supposes that.The Law is a ass — a idiot.’
– – Mr. Bumble

You are correct. It looks silly in a high profile case like this but that’s standard federal civil practice.

The Attorney General is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of Plaintiffs’ allegations in Paragraph 13 that Mr. Orrin desires to carry a firearm in public for self-defense while he visits California . . .

The Attorney General is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of Plaintiffs’ allegations in Paragraph 15 that Ms. Sensiba desires to carry a firearm in public for self-defense while she visits California . . .”

The Plaintiffs have sufficient information to form a belief as to the Attorney General being full of sh*7.

All Democrats are clowns these days because none of them can admit the truth. All they do is play games. If they believe what they’re doing is right, then why aren’t they always bragging about it?