<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: He Who Controls the Gun Narrative Controls the Future	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-nation/he-who-controls-the-gun-narrative-controls-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-nation/he-who-controls-the-gun-narrative-controls-the-future/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 12:36:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: .40 cal Booger		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-nation/he-who-controls-the-gun-narrative-controls-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-9184</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[.40 cal Booger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 12:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=12638#comment-9184</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-nation/he-who-controls-the-gun-narrative-controls-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-9182&quot;&gt;.40 cal Booger&lt;/a&gt;.

Correction for: &quot;...there are literally millions of (collectively) “children, household members, and others” in homes with firearms that do not have unintentional deaths.&quot;

Should have been...

...there are literally millions of (collectively) “children, household members, and others” in homes with firearms that do not have unintentional deaths or suicides or homicides or violent domestic disputes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-nation/he-who-controls-the-gun-narrative-controls-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-9182">.40 cal Booger</a>.</p>
<p>Correction for: &#8220;&#8230;there are literally millions of (collectively) “children, household members, and others” in homes with firearms that do not have unintentional deaths.&#8221;</p>
<p>Should have been&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;there are literally millions of (collectively) “children, household members, and others” in homes with firearms that do not have unintentional deaths or suicides or homicides or violent domestic disputes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: .40 cal Booger		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-nation/he-who-controls-the-gun-narrative-controls-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-9182</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[.40 cal Booger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 11:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=12638#comment-9182</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;A firearm in the home significantly increases the risk of suicide, homicide, death during domestic disputes, and unintentional deaths to children, household members, and others.&quot;

All a lie.

1. A person with suicide ideation is always at 100% increased risk of suicide, no matter if a gun is in the home or not. This is already settled science. There is no one &#039;thing&#039; or &#039;groups of things&#039; that increases risk of suicide, its all the person their self. 

2. A gun in the home does not increase risk of homicide, death during domestic disputes,. The vast majority of these are carried out with non-firearm means/weapons, and 60% of homicides are committed by a subset demographic in 13% of the population and over 80% of that 60% uses non-firearm means/weapons. The top &#039;weapons&#039; used to inflict death during domestic disputes is not a firearm, its blunt objects and hands/feet accounting for over 80% of deaths during domestic disputes.  

3. &quot;increase risk....and unintentional deaths to children, household members, and others.&quot; - there are literally millions of (collectively) &quot;children, household members, and others&quot; in homes with firearms that do not have unintentional deaths. Accounting for those in risk assessment brings the likely hood of such unintentional deaths to children, household members, and others due to a gun in the home brings the &#039;risk&#039; down to less than the risk of drowning in a swimming pool and indeed, propotionally, a person is over 1,500 times more likely to be run over by a car and 500 times more likely to drown in a swimming pool than they are to meet an unintentional death due to a gun in the home.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A firearm in the home significantly increases the risk of suicide, homicide, death during domestic disputes, and unintentional deaths to children, household members, and others.&#8221;</p>
<p>All a lie.</p>
<p>1. A person with suicide ideation is always at 100% increased risk of suicide, no matter if a gun is in the home or not. This is already settled science. There is no one &#8216;thing&#8217; or &#8216;groups of things&#8217; that increases risk of suicide, its all the person their self. </p>
<p>2. A gun in the home does not increase risk of homicide, death during domestic disputes,. The vast majority of these are carried out with non-firearm means/weapons, and 60% of homicides are committed by a subset demographic in 13% of the population and over 80% of that 60% uses non-firearm means/weapons. The top &#8216;weapons&#8217; used to inflict death during domestic disputes is not a firearm, its blunt objects and hands/feet accounting for over 80% of deaths during domestic disputes.  </p>
<p>3. &#8220;increase risk&#8230;.and unintentional deaths to children, household members, and others.&#8221; &#8211; there are literally millions of (collectively) &#8220;children, household members, and others&#8221; in homes with firearms that do not have unintentional deaths. Accounting for those in risk assessment brings the likely hood of such unintentional deaths to children, household members, and others due to a gun in the home brings the &#8216;risk&#8217; down to less than the risk of drowning in a swimming pool and indeed, propotionally, a person is over 1,500 times more likely to be run over by a car and 500 times more likely to drown in a swimming pool than they are to meet an unintentional death due to a gun in the home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dude		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-nation/he-who-controls-the-gun-narrative-controls-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-9154</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 21:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=12638#comment-9154</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-nation/he-who-controls-the-gun-narrative-controls-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-9141&quot;&gt;SAFEupstateFML&lt;/a&gt;.

Yes. As long as properly insured and licensed deathcare professionals assist you, then you&#039;re allowed to off yourself. There are rules. We don&#039;t want more dead bald eagles.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-nation/he-who-controls-the-gun-narrative-controls-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-9141">SAFEupstateFML</a>.</p>
<p>Yes. As long as properly insured and licensed deathcare professionals assist you, then you&#8217;re allowed to off yourself. There are rules. We don&#8217;t want more dead bald eagles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SAFEupstateFML		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-nation/he-who-controls-the-gun-narrative-controls-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-9141</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAFEupstateFML]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 16:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=12638#comment-9141</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-nation/he-who-controls-the-gun-narrative-controls-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-9135&quot;&gt;Geoff PR&lt;/a&gt;.

Probably just want to charge a fee for the service of assisted suicide.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-nation/he-who-controls-the-gun-narrative-controls-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-9135">Geoff PR</a>.</p>
<p>Probably just want to charge a fee for the service of assisted suicide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Geoff PR		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-nation/he-who-controls-the-gun-narrative-controls-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-9135</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoff PR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 14:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=12638#comment-9135</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wait a sec, I thought, according to them, suicide was personal choice that NO ONE had a right to interfere with, and they are *warning* about something that’s a personal right?

Huh?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a sec, I thought, according to them, suicide was personal choice that NO ONE had a right to interfere with, and they are *warning* about something that’s a personal right?</p>
<p>Huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
