That’s a big part of how they build their narrative, by repetition. In fact, if you look at some of their studies closely you begin to see the same sets of data being used for different purposes to reach different conclusions that are bogus because the data set was for something else and they are juts repeating the use of it to give results that are not true but looks good to people who don’t know any better ’cause researcher said’. Repetition is a big thing with anti-gun, and its contributing to their downfall because you can only repeat something so many times before others start taking a closer look at it and go “but this doesn’t make sense.”. Like that ‘guns are the number one killer of children” lie they repeated that over and over for years until one day someone took a look at the underlying data and found out the data includes adults.