1. The ‘government’ has a legal and moral and constitutional responsibility to ensure its actions are correctly based in factual and applicable law BEFORE issuing such things as this.

2. The police chief signed it.

3. Obviously, when dealing with civil liberty and civil right (the 2A is a civil liberty, but also a civil right was impacted here also), a ‘government’ has a constitutional, moral, and legal responsibility to make sure these are not infringed in any manner even ‘mistakenly’.

This was intentionally printed, cited, referenced, approved by the city council, and signed by the police chief.

Review complete.

1. There was no ‘mistake’ even if incompetence was in play. The intent was clearly, by action, to publish such an order for actual enactment even if it was not enforced and was in error. The city ‘government’ had a responsibility to make sure it was ‘accurate and correct’ BEFORE such action took place.

2. Had Florida Carry, Inc. not jumped on it when they did, it would have been in full force and would for a fact have continued to exist as an ‘infringement’ even if not enforced.

3. The very fact that it was intentionally printed, cited, referenced, approved by the city council, and signed by the police chief, even if not enforced or was a ‘mistake’, is a ‘deliberate’ act of infringement on a civil liberty and civil right and was for a fact a violation of state law.

Make them pay.

(note: The terms “civil rights” and “civil liberties” are often used interchangeably, but their meanings are different and distinct. Civil liberties are freedoms guaranteed to you by the Constitution to protect you from tyranny and give you protection from federal or state government actions. For example, the first 10 rights (and all rights) in the Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution are civil liberties. Civil rights, in contrast, are the legal rights detailed in federal (and in some cases state) laws and statutes that protect you from discrimination or some other detrimental ‘government action something’ that can impact civil liberty. An example of a civil right is the right to be free from employment discrimination based on a protected factor such as, for example, race or disability.)
***********

clarification for “or some other detrimental ‘government action something’ that can impact civil liberty.”

It doesn’t need to always be a government action, it can be a private sector action. For example: As an employee, you don’t have the legal (civil) right to a promotion because getting a promotion is not a guaranteed civil liberty. However, as a female employee, you have the legal (civil) right to be free from discrimination in being considered for that promotion, and legally can’t be be denied a promotion based on your gender or any other protected factor. By choosing not to promote a female worker solely based on gender, an employer commits a civil rights violation. In doing so, the employer engages in unlawful employment discrimination based on sex or gender, thus affecting a civil liberty under the 14th Amendment because the 14th Amendment equal protection clause provides the basis for civil rights against such discrimination.

So overall, Civil liberties concern the actual basic freedoms and Civil rights concern the treatment of a person regarding certain rights.

Sue for thirty grand and hold o blowout range day and BBQ in his honor when you collect.

BYW Dan, my phone keeps telling me Kat’s article on diamond sights isn’t a secure website and won’t let me read it…

Does the gov’t ever hesitate to make an example out of any citizen if they can? How can there be anything inadvertent about this?