Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Cites the Black Codes as Constitutional in Gun Control Case.

”
…
Carrie Severino
@JCNSeverino
Things I didn’t have on my bingo card today: Justice Jackson defending the racist Black Codes as precedent for what we should consider constitutional.
…
Carrie Severino
@JCNSeverino
Principal Deputy Solicitor General Sarah Harris’s response to Justice Gorsuch’s question on the relevance of the Black Codes was spot on:

‘It is 2026, and it is somewhat astonishing that Black Codes, which are unconstitutional, are being offered as evidence of what our tradition of constitutionally permissible firearm regulation looks like.’
…
Astonishingly, it’s Jackson arguing this. Fortunately, Justice Samuel Alito was there to point out the irony.

Must Listen: Justice Alito reveals the obvious irony of citing the Black Codes as justification for Hawaii’s 2023 firearm restriction law.

‘They wanted to disarm the Black population in order to help the Klan terrorize them…they wanted to put them at the mercy of racist law enforcement officers. So is it not the height of irony to cite a law that was enacted for exactly the purpose of preventing someone from exercising the Second Amendment right, to cite this as an example of what the Second Amendment protects.”’
…”

ht* tps://twitchy.com/brettt/2026/01/20/alito-points-out-irony-of-jackson-citing-the-black-codes-as-justification-for-hawaiis-gun-control-n2424174

ht* tps://pjmedia.com/catherinesalgado/2026/01/20/shocking-video-indicates-illegal-aliens-bribed-ohio-judges-n4948517

Clarification for : “And it is our top political and government leadership who are egging it on, or worse.”

This is in reference to Minnesota left wing democrats leadership.

Washington Gun Law: How Much Trouble is Don Lemon In? [telling about laws violated by Lemon and his insane left wingers, exactly violated, just like the laws define.]

ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xEbNt1c65Y

“On Sunday, a mob of anti-ICE protesters stormed a church in St. Paul. Minn., during a church service. The radicals, with disgraced former CNN host Don Lemon along for the ride, terrified the congregants by disrupting the service.
…
Radical leftists claim that the protest — or act of terror, which is really what it was — is free speech that the First Amendment protects. What they miss is that a church is private property, and the First Amendment also ensures freedom of religion.
…
Furthermore, as my HotAir colleague David Strom points out, Minnesota’s Democrats have not only not condemned the domestic terrorism, but some of them have gone on record promoting it. He writes, “The goal is to frighten, intimidate, make life hell, and in some cases, actually harm people. And it is our top political and government leadership who are egging it on, or worse.”

‘People have been stalked, employees of hotels threatened, and restaurants have been challenged to poison [ICE] agents,’ David reports. ‘{ICE} Agents have crowds banging pots and pans and blowing whistles at night to prevent their ability to sleep, and, famously, churchgoers have had their worship service invaded.’
…”

[note: The actions of Lemon and his insane left wingers, the new version of the KKK and Nazi Brown Shirts, in this act of domestic terrorism, violated a couple of different federal laws when they did this. See below video from Washington Gun Law for explanation.]

ht* tps://pjmedia.com/chris-queen/2026/01/20/your-church-isnt-immune-after-minnesotas-church-invasion-its-time-to-prepare-n4948521

At one time if the gun store refused your business. You just get what you wanted using a mail-order catalog.

And you can still buy a house. And have it delivered to your property. It should be the same way with arms and ammunition.