Comments on: What’s At Stake If SCOTUS Won’t Take California’s ‘High Capacity’ Magazine Ban Case

By: Snidely Whiplash

Snidely Whiplash — Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:06:38 +0000

In reply to FW. The court has been using the 14th amendment over the years to incorporate each, individual constitutionally protected right down to the states.

By: Mark G

Mark G — Mon, 24 Mar 2025 23:57:08 +0000

Should SCOTUS refuse to take the case and the 9th Circuit’s ruling takes effect, I think it will show the true nature of California gun owners. The question will be, just how will they handle it?

Option 1 would be that everyone disposes of their now-illegal magazines in one way or another, saying to the tyrants in California government, in effect, “Thank you sir! May I have another?”
Option 2 would be that very few comply and it will be up to the state to deal with those they manage to catch.
Option 3 would be that those who do not comply decide that enough is enough and those in California government will be removed – forcibly – from office.

I, for one, sincerely hope that Option 3 never comes to pass, but I fear that people are fed up with the tyranny and they’re realizing that the courts are little to no help. When that realization happens, all bets are off.

By: SAFEupstateFML

SAFEupstateFML — Mon, 24 Mar 2025 23:45:13 +0000

In reply to Micha Elyi. You must be new here, may I introduce you to the power of and.

By: FW

FW — Mon, 24 Mar 2025 23:14:19 +0000

In reply to FW. Art 6 Sec 2 sorry.

By: FW

FW — Mon, 24 Mar 2025 23:13:30 +0000

Education time: In 1833, the US SC decided Barron v Baltimore. The outcome was that the SC decided NONE OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS BOUND THE STATES. Again, none of the BoR applied to the states, not the 1st or 2nd or any other. That decision has NEVER BEEN OVERTURNED. Had the US SC follow Art 6 Sec 6 which makes the Constitution, etc the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND, this case would never have caused the damage it has to the RIGHT of the People to keep and bear Arms. Never for a moment think the US SC will fix anything. They caused the problems we have.

By: Micha Elyi

Micha Elyi — Mon, 24 Mar 2025 22:32:18 +0000

In reply to Geoff “I’m getting too old for this stuff” PR.

I doubt that.

But Geoff if making up such a story makes you feel better then you’re being childish.

By: Micha Elyi

Micha Elyi — Mon, 24 Mar 2025 22:31:15 +0000

In reply to Darkman.

I didn’t vote for that. And what do you mean by the empty phrase “allowing to happen”?

D, you’re making the ontological mistake of treating “the citizens of California” as if we are all one undifferentiated mass. Are you a closet socialist?

By: Nate Redshill

Nate Redshill — Mon, 24 Mar 2025 22:18:26 +0000

Sorry, but just the sort of mess that Roberts and Barrett love to create.

By: SAFEupstateFML

SAFEupstateFML — Mon, 24 Mar 2025 10:03:19 +0000

In reply to Geoff “I’m getting too old for this stuff” PR.

https://revolver.news/2025/03/the-case-against-justice-roberts-is-he-owned-by-the-cia/
Dig deeper

By: Geoff "I'm getting too old for this stuff" PR

Geoff "I'm getting too old for this stuff" PR — Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:59:50 +0000

“This is what is at stake if SCOTUS denies cert on the lame excuses of “percolation” or “waiting for a circuit split” (that will never come).”

I have a queasy feeling the reason for not being granted cert. is that Thomas, et.al, isn’t confident Cony-Barret will vote the way we will want… 🙁