Comments on: The 2A-Shy Supreme Court Has Another Key Gun Case Headed Their Way

By: Sam I Am

Sam I Am — Fri, 14 Mar 2025 17:29:18 +0000

SC justices, and all judges everywhere, are, at the core, politicians. It is how they are chosen. Expecting the judiciary, at any level, to be absolutely unbiased, or agenda-free, is childish foolishness. When the politicians (and sometimes voters) are the source of the judiciary, politics cannot be avoided in making choices. Is it at all sensible/logical to expect perfect results from a system of flawed humans?

Justice is in the eye of the beholder (it depends on whose ox is being gored). We want what we want, when we want it, and not when we don’t want it. In the end, judges and justices end up parsing the principle established by Humpty Dumpty: “When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’ ‘The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean so many different things.’ ’The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which is to be master — that’s all.”

By: Ticked Off

Ticked Off — Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:43:01 +0000

With Roberts and ACB aligning themselves with the 3 professed liberals on the Court, don’t expect anything good regarding your 2A rights coming from SCOTUS.

SCOTUS has become the guarantor of the Government’s rights – not yours.

By: SAFEupstateFML

SAFEupstateFML — Wed, 12 Mar 2025 17:23:29 +0000

In reply to Nanashi. Because Bruen is all of 3 years old and most of the cases involved are substantially older and many of the infringements were built up over 120 years+? Unfortunately shit takes time and we have a lot of slimy judges so it is likely to take longer still unless you are willing to go the blood and iron route.

By: Nanashi

Nanashi — Wed, 12 Mar 2025 04:04:36 +0000

“FPC and our allies have successfully shown that these age-based bans are unconstitutional and cannot survive scrutiny”
Then why do the courts keep allowing bans on ~25% of the population to continue, only carving out “protections” for a tiny 2% of the population?

By: Dad

Dad — Tue, 11 Mar 2025 23:11:48 +0000

SCOTUS’s thumbs must be sore after spending so much time up their asses.

By: .40 cal Booger

.40 cal Booger — Tue, 11 Mar 2025 19:44:40 +0000

MASSIVE BREAKING NEWS: AG PAM BONDI FORMS 2A RESTORATION WORKING GROUP…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZterNiVwyhc