with ruthless (she couldn’t come) german efficiency.
having been made aware that other scenarios may possibly represent multiple improvements, we hereby take it under advisement to modify the original imperative.
jib cut admired.

Not at first.

First, evict their butts to other countries.

Second, turn the buildings into an ICE detention facility.

Then when the illegal aliens are deported, third, turn it into a prison to hold all these violent left wingers and when its filled to capacity bulldoze it into the Hudson with them inside.

Then when thats done give the land to the NRA to build a new NRA branded building they are not going to occupy….just to PO New York.

i’m with you, jimby. half a dozen idf caterpillar d9 bulldozers shove all their garbage into the hudson. gtfo.

“The finger-pointing frenzy is in full swing on social media, with viral posts now blaming everything from DOGE to vague ‘federal budget cuts’ for the tragedy. However, these claims were literally debunked last week. For example, WIRED admitted that the NWS did its job perfectly.

‘But meteorologists who spoke to WIRED say that the NWS accurately predicted the risk of flooding in Texas and could not have foreseen the extreme severity of the storm. What’s more, they say that what the NWS did forecast this week underscores the need to sustain funding to the crucial agency.’
…
They’re not alone either. On Monday, the left-wing outlet Politico also admitted that the anti-Trump narrative surrounding the tragedy is dead wrong.

‘And let’s be clear: Just as my Playbook colleague Zack Stanton set out in yesterday’s newsletter, there’s still absolutely no evidence that Trump’s NWS cuts had any impact on what happened in Texas on Friday morning. As you’d expect, local and national reporters alike have been digging away at this angle incredibly hard — and so far, the picture that’s emerging is one of a National Weather Service that did its job as a catastrophic weather event unfolded.’
…

As for the claim that the NWS was understaffed because of cuts? That’s bogus too:

‘The National Weather Service office in New Braunfels, which delivers forecasts for Austin, San Antonio and the surrounding areas, had extra staff on duty during the storms, Runyen said.

Where the office would typically have two forecasters on duty during clear weather, they had up to five on staff.

‘There were extra people in here that night, and that’s typical in every weather service office — you staff up for an event and bring people in on overtime and hold people over,’ Runyen said.

…”

https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/07/07/the-liberal-media-destroyed-the-democrats-anti-trump-flood-narrative-n4941503

The U.N. is and organization but operates as though a ‘foreign power of its own separate country’ – its member states comprise the U.N. and its authority is derived from that member state coalition thus ‘foreign power’ – however, its power is not what people think. It takes a member state willingness to implement a U.N. edict and a member state can not do so if they wish. However, it does not mean the people of the member state are bound by the U.N. edict and obligated to follow it if the member state chooses to implement the edict. Our constitution gives the people the freedom from having the edicts of a foreign power forced upon them – we fought war to keep that from happening and won so….

And how exactly are they going to “force” U.S. manufacturers, retailers and users to comply? They can’t legally or legitimately send U.N. troops, they have no police powers to use against the ‘people’ on U.S. soil, there is no U.S. law obligating the U.S. to it, no act of congress obligating the congress to it – and even if some way or another the U.S. government was obligated to it the people have no obligation to follow any U.N. edict or obligation to any U.S. law that’s trying to enforce an edict of a ‘foreign power’ (which the U.N.), so how are they going to ‘force’ the U.S. people (i.e. U.S. manufacturers, retailers and users) to comply with it?