This affected my family directly: while on a vacation trip to another state we stopped in a local gun store and found a handgun that we really wanted to purchase–and could not because we were not residents of that state.

On a more practical note, this lawsuit should be a slam dunk for the plaintiffs: the objective of the U.S. Constitution’s Interstate Commerce Clause is to ENSURE that we can purchase items from other states or while in other states without impediments. The current position of the federal government–that the Interstate Commerce Clause empowers them to HALT (under the guise of “regulating”) sales in/from other states is exactly the opposite intent of the Commerce Clause.