<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Corporate Media Outlets Only Too Happy to Help Regurgitate Michael Bloomberg&#8217;s Anti-Gun Agitprop	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-control/corporate-media-outlets-only-too-happy-to-regurgitate-michael-bloombergs-anti-gun-agitprop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-control/corporate-media-outlets-only-too-happy-to-regurgitate-michael-bloombergs-anti-gun-agitprop/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 08:11:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: .40 cal Booger		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-control/corporate-media-outlets-only-too-happy-to-regurgitate-michael-bloombergs-anti-gun-agitprop/comment-page-1/#comment-76688</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[.40 cal Booger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 08:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=28240#comment-76688</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Unbiased my butt. For example, he also claims that 90% of Americans want stricter gun control, but what hes not telling you he is lying about it - he takes the approximate number of people &#039;physically&#039; in the U.S. population (men, women, children, infants, illegal aliens) and assumes that because some of them do not own guns it means they want stricter gun control. These are the types of number games these anti-gun play, especially when it comes to their surveys and studies, where they lie about the results claiming it represents some number of Americans when in reality their data set is either statistically insignificant or biased by their application by leaving significant data out and then there is the &#039;guided approach&#039; biased questions they use in their surveys where no matter how you answer its going to be counted in favor of their agenda and they also omitt responses in their math that do not support their agenda.

The anti-gun wackos say the quiet part out loud - but here&#039;s the truth about gun owners.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BakCHfc_PT0]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unbiased my butt. For example, he also claims that 90% of Americans want stricter gun control, but what hes not telling you he is lying about it &#8211; he takes the approximate number of people &#8216;physically&#8217; in the U.S. population (men, women, children, infants, illegal aliens) and assumes that because some of them do not own guns it means they want stricter gun control. These are the types of number games these anti-gun play, especially when it comes to their surveys and studies, where they lie about the results claiming it represents some number of Americans when in reality their data set is either statistically insignificant or biased by their application by leaving significant data out and then there is the &#8216;guided approach&#8217; biased questions they use in their surveys where no matter how you answer its going to be counted in favor of their agenda and they also omitt responses in their math that do not support their agenda.</p>
<p>The anti-gun wackos say the quiet part out loud &#8211; but here&#8217;s the truth about gun owners.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BakCHfc_PT0" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BakCHfc_PT0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
