<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Biden Signals His Intent to Give the Gun Control Industry a Parting Gift on His Way Out the Door	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-control/biden-signals-his-intent-to-give-the-gun-control-industry-a-parting-gift-on-his-way-out-the-door/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-control/biden-signals-his-intent-to-give-the-gun-control-industry-a-parting-gift-on-his-way-out-the-door/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 19:34:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: .40 cal Booger		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-control/biden-signals-his-intent-to-give-the-gun-control-industry-a-parting-gift-on-his-way-out-the-door/comment-page-1/#comment-9388</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[.40 cal Booger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 19:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=12916#comment-9388</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Could they be dumb enough to try to enact an “assault weapons” ban by executive order?

That would be really dumb for various reasons but one is that such an order would automatically be unconstitutional because no where in the constitution or SCOTUS precedent or in law does the president have the authority or power to ban anything property wise (including firearms) for individuals by executive order. And besides, the American public nor industry is obligated to follow such an executive order. 

An executive order is a directive from the President that has much of the same power as a federal law, for those in federal service IN the executive branch and in some cases outside the executive branch. But not all executive orders are lawful or constitutional. There are very limited circumstances where an executive order can be used to affect the public or industry, and none of them allow the president to issue an executive order banning personal property from being owned or bought or sold or held or used. It would take Biden actually overthrowing the country with a military junta and suspending the constitution to enforce such an executive order to ban personal property.

So I tend to think its not a ban by executive order, its tantamount to declaring war.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could they be dumb enough to try to enact an “assault weapons” ban by executive order?</p>
<p>That would be really dumb for various reasons but one is that such an order would automatically be unconstitutional because no where in the constitution or SCOTUS precedent or in law does the president have the authority or power to ban anything property wise (including firearms) for individuals by executive order. And besides, the American public nor industry is obligated to follow such an executive order. </p>
<p>An executive order is a directive from the President that has much of the same power as a federal law, for those in federal service IN the executive branch and in some cases outside the executive branch. But not all executive orders are lawful or constitutional. There are very limited circumstances where an executive order can be used to affect the public or industry, and none of them allow the president to issue an executive order banning personal property from being owned or bought or sold or held or used. It would take Biden actually overthrowing the country with a military junta and suspending the constitution to enforce such an executive order to ban personal property.</p>
<p>So I tend to think its not a ban by executive order, its tantamount to declaring war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-control/biden-signals-his-intent-to-give-the-gun-control-industry-a-parting-gift-on-his-way-out-the-door/comment-page-1/#comment-9374</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 14:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=12916#comment-9374</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Could they be dumb enough to try to enact an “assault weapons” ban by executive order? Unilaterally declare that that all AR-15s and AK47s are now regulated under the National Firearms Act? Why not? What do they have to lose?&quot;

Gun control in general is a wounded animal, thanks to Trump&#039;s SCotUS picks that gave us a favorable Supreme Court. And a wounded animal is a dangerous animal.

If they the lose election, I bet they will &#039;Go For Broke&#039;, and we better hope we can find a federal judge to injunction their bullshit...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Could they be dumb enough to try to enact an “assault weapons” ban by executive order? Unilaterally declare that that all AR-15s and AK47s are now regulated under the National Firearms Act? Why not? What do they have to lose?&#8221;</p>
<p>Gun control in general is a wounded animal, thanks to Trump&#8217;s SCotUS picks that gave us a favorable Supreme Court. And a wounded animal is a dangerous animal.</p>
<p>If they the lose election, I bet they will &#8216;Go For Broke&#8217;, and we better hope we can find a federal judge to injunction their bullshit&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
