<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Good Gear: Magpul&#8217;s New(ish) AMAG 17-Round Metal P320/M17 Magazines	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gear-review/good-gear-magpuls-newish-amag-17-round-p320-m17-magazines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gear-review/good-gear-magpuls-newish-amag-17-round-p320-m17-magazines/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2024 20:12:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan Zimmerman		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gear-review/good-gear-magpuls-newish-amag-17-round-p320-m17-magazines/comment-page-1/#comment-864</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Zimmerman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2024 20:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=4297#comment-864</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I own a &lt;em&gt;lot&lt;/em&gt; of PMAGs (mostly Gen3) and have literally never had a problem. I got an iffy G19 mag, but others I own run really well. The AMAG so far is first rate.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own a <em>lot</em> of PMAGs (mostly Gen3) and have literally never had a problem. I got an iffy G19 mag, but others I own run really well. The AMAG so far is first rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: shiggs		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gear-review/good-gear-magpuls-newish-amag-17-round-p320-m17-magazines/comment-page-1/#comment-863</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shiggs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2024 19:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=4297#comment-863</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Magpul gets a lot of hype for quality and price but in my experience the only AR mags that have broken on me were a couple of gen 2 pmags. The feed lips just gave up for no apparent reason. I wasn’t impressed with their G19 mags either. Get one and some of that garbage Winchester Forged ammo and you can practice malfunction clearing on range day. But hey, sunglasses and Daka pouches, oh boy!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Magpul gets a lot of hype for quality and price but in my experience the only AR mags that have broken on me were a couple of gen 2 pmags. The feed lips just gave up for no apparent reason. I wasn’t impressed with their G19 mags either. Get one and some of that garbage Winchester Forged ammo and you can practice malfunction clearing on range day. But hey, sunglasses and Daka pouches, oh boy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
