<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: First Look: EOTECH&#8217;s Vudu 3-9&#215;32 SFP Super Short Rifle Scope	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gear-review/first-look-eotechs-vudu-3-9x32-sfp-super-short-rifle-scope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gear-review/first-look-eotechs-vudu-3-9x32-sfp-super-short-rifle-scope/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 22:43:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: .40 cal Booger		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gear-review/first-look-eotechs-vudu-3-9x32-sfp-super-short-rifle-scope/comment-page-1/#comment-27541</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[.40 cal Booger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 22:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=21733#comment-27541</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I like the size at around 6 inches long - but the price not so much. But a 3x-9x doesn&#039;t interest me anyway.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the size at around 6 inches long &#8211; but the price not so much. But a 3x-9x doesn&#8217;t interest me anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Paul		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gear-review/first-look-eotechs-vudu-3-9x32-sfp-super-short-rifle-scope/comment-page-1/#comment-27521</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 21:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=21733#comment-27521</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[November Tango Foxtrot Charlie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>November Tango Foxtrot Charlie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dude		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gear-review/first-look-eotechs-vudu-3-9x32-sfp-super-short-rifle-scope/comment-page-1/#comment-27496</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 19:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=21733#comment-27496</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you don&#039;t mind a larger scope, the Trijicon Accupoint 3-9x40 is only 13.4 oz and never needs batteries.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t mind a larger scope, the Trijicon Accupoint 3-9&#215;40 is only 13.4 oz and never needs batteries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: 3Sss		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gear-review/first-look-eotechs-vudu-3-9x32-sfp-super-short-rifle-scope/comment-page-1/#comment-27458</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[3Sss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 17:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=21733#comment-27458</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[“ Back when I started on the path, when it came to variable powered rifle scopes, 3-9X was it. There was no such thing as an LPVO (a low-powered variable optic)” I have a weaver 1.5-4.5 that dates to the late 60s-early 70s, I believe that would qualify as an LPVO. If not other models with lower advertised minimum magnification existed. Nothing is actually new.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“ Back when I started on the path, when it came to variable powered rifle scopes, 3-9X was it. There was no such thing as an LPVO (a low-powered variable optic)” I have a weaver 1.5-4.5 that dates to the late 60s-early 70s, I believe that would qualify as an LPVO. If not other models with lower advertised minimum magnification existed. Nothing is actually new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
