<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Atrius Backs Retailers Facing Rare Breed Patent Infringement Claims	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gear-news/atrius-backs-retailers-facing-rare-breed-patent-infringement-claims/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gear-news/atrius-backs-retailers-facing-rare-breed-patent-infringement-claims/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 16:43:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Void		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gear-news/atrius-backs-retailers-facing-rare-breed-patent-infringement-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-151805</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Void]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 16:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=34118#comment-151805</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gear-news/atrius-backs-retailers-facing-rare-breed-patent-infringement-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-151802&quot;&gt;.40 cal Booger&lt;/a&gt;.

Kinda makes you wonder why multiple companies don&#039;t just make an agreement to mass manufacture the products under license to flood the zone while others work on improved versions. Oh well minimal progress it is.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gear-news/atrius-backs-retailers-facing-rare-breed-patent-infringement-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-151802">.40 cal Booger</a>.</p>
<p>Kinda makes you wonder why multiple companies don&#8217;t just make an agreement to mass manufacture the products under license to flood the zone while others work on improved versions. Oh well minimal progress it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: .40 cal Booger		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/gear-news/atrius-backs-retailers-facing-rare-breed-patent-infringement-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-151802</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[.40 cal Booger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=34118#comment-151802</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;...the frivolous patent assertions made by Rare Breed against the Second Amendment community. &quot;

?

Rare Breed didn&#039;t make any &quot;assertions&quot; against the &quot;Second Amendment community&quot;.

Rare Breed made &quot;assertions&quot; against specific &#039;corporate/company&#039; entities that claim to be or are part of or function within or market products to the &quot;Second Amendment community&quot;.

For example, I am part of the &quot;Second Amendment community&quot; and Rare Breed didn&#039;t make any &quot;assertions&quot; against me, but Rare Breed made &quot;assertions&quot; against Atrius Development Group &#039;corporate/company&#039; entities.

Atrius, its kinda wrong to use the &quot;Second Amendment community&quot; as a prop in your &#039;corporate/company&#039; entities legal issues/battles.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;the frivolous patent assertions made by Rare Breed against the Second Amendment community. &#8221;</p>
<p>?</p>
<p>Rare Breed didn&#8217;t make any &#8220;assertions&#8221; against the &#8220;Second Amendment community&#8221;.</p>
<p>Rare Breed made &#8220;assertions&#8221; against specific &#8216;corporate/company&#8217; entities that claim to be or are part of or function within or market products to the &#8220;Second Amendment community&#8221;.</p>
<p>For example, I am part of the &#8220;Second Amendment community&#8221; and Rare Breed didn&#8217;t make any &#8220;assertions&#8221; against me, but Rare Breed made &#8220;assertions&#8221; against Atrius Development Group &#8216;corporate/company&#8217; entities.</p>
<p>Atrius, its kinda wrong to use the &#8220;Second Amendment community&#8221; as a prop in your &#8216;corporate/company&#8217; entities legal issues/battles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
