<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why Are Anti-Gun Attorneys&#8217; Arguments So Transparently Bad?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/firearms-policy-coalition/why-are-anti-gun-attorneys-arguments-so-transparently-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/firearms-policy-coalition/why-are-anti-gun-attorneys-arguments-so-transparently-bad/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 20:37:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: LampofDiogenes		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/firearms-policy-coalition/why-are-anti-gun-attorneys-arguments-so-transparently-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LampofDiogenes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 20:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=2927#comment-191</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One has to ask - is the stupidity of their arguments evidence of &#039;bad faith&#039; (which I used to believe, and still do in some cases - Shannon Watts, Mini Mike, etc.), or is it just an inevitable result of their abject ignorance of actual firearms??  Many &quot;anti-gunners&quot; really believe this kind of BS, and then when you start delving deeper, you find that they . . . simply have no effin&#039; idea what they are talking about.

Many members of my immediate family are fairly hardcore anti-gun zealots - and I know from my long experience of them (and also talking to them about the details of their beliefs) that they have NO FRICKIN&#039; IDEA in the world how guns work.  Try to explain it to them and they get exasperated because their lack of knowledge is SO deep and pervasive.  Offer to take them to the range and let them experience it for themselves, and they will usually decline, because &quot;guns are icky&quot;.  When I have been successful at getting ardent anti-gunners out to the range, it is usually transformative for them.  Hard to continue believing Shannon and Mini Mike vs. you own lyin&#039; eyes.  Several have ended by saying something like &quot;Well, I can see why you like it, and it isn&#039;t what I thought it was, but it&#039;s not for me.&quot;  OK, cool - nobody else is obligated to like what I like - but they at least now had ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE (vs BS anti-gun propaganda), so I was satisfied with that.

I even started a low-key movement by trying to persuade my shooting buddies to &quot;Take an Anti-Gunner to the Range&quot; movement.  Those that bothered to do so reported similar results to mine.  I commend it to the POTG as a useful strategy - hard to believe the BS put out by the anti-gunners when you&#039;ve actually fired a few for yourself, and KNOW that most of the propaganda is a lie.  Just sayin&#039;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One has to ask &#8211; is the stupidity of their arguments evidence of &#8216;bad faith&#8217; (which I used to believe, and still do in some cases &#8211; Shannon Watts, Mini Mike, etc.), or is it just an inevitable result of their abject ignorance of actual firearms??  Many &#8220;anti-gunners&#8221; really believe this kind of BS, and then when you start delving deeper, you find that they . . . simply have no effin&#8217; idea what they are talking about.</p>
<p>Many members of my immediate family are fairly hardcore anti-gun zealots &#8211; and I know from my long experience of them (and also talking to them about the details of their beliefs) that they have NO FRICKIN&#8217; IDEA in the world how guns work.  Try to explain it to them and they get exasperated because their lack of knowledge is SO deep and pervasive.  Offer to take them to the range and let them experience it for themselves, and they will usually decline, because &#8220;guns are icky&#8221;.  When I have been successful at getting ardent anti-gunners out to the range, it is usually transformative for them.  Hard to continue believing Shannon and Mini Mike vs. you own lyin&#8217; eyes.  Several have ended by saying something like &#8220;Well, I can see why you like it, and it isn&#8217;t what I thought it was, but it&#8217;s not for me.&#8221;  OK, cool &#8211; nobody else is obligated to like what I like &#8211; but they at least now had ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE (vs BS anti-gun propaganda), so I was satisfied with that.</p>
<p>I even started a low-key movement by trying to persuade my shooting buddies to &#8220;Take an Anti-Gunner to the Range&#8221; movement.  Those that bothered to do so reported similar results to mine.  I commend it to the POTG as a useful strategy &#8211; hard to believe the BS put out by the anti-gunners when you&#8217;ve actually fired a few for yourself, and KNOW that most of the propaganda is a lie.  Just sayin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nanashi		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/firearms-policy-coalition/why-are-anti-gun-attorneys-arguments-so-transparently-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nanashi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 01:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=2927#comment-187</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s simple: Not being able to read read or count to Two are pre-requisites to being on their side.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s simple: Not being able to read read or count to Two are pre-requisites to being on their side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LifeSavor		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/firearms-policy-coalition/why-are-anti-gun-attorneys-arguments-so-transparently-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LifeSavor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 22:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=2927#comment-185</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sounds reasonable,  Jennifer.
Low-quality legal arguments to defend low-quality laws.
Lose, and write more low-quality laws and defend them with more low-quality arguments.
Keep the persecution going.
Run out the clock until you can replace SCOTUS justices.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds reasonable,  Jennifer.<br />
Low-quality legal arguments to defend low-quality laws.<br />
Lose, and write more low-quality laws and defend them with more low-quality arguments.<br />
Keep the persecution going.<br />
Run out the clock until you can replace SCOTUS justices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Shire-man		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/firearms-policy-coalition/why-are-anti-gun-attorneys-arguments-so-transparently-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shire-man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 22:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=2927#comment-184</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why bother with good arguments when the system has already decided on your favor? Sure, they hit a speed bump now and then but the uniparty and the entirely neo-feudalist system has decided gun control/bans are the future.

Any hearing is a formality and any decision in favor of liberty is only temporary assuming it isn&#039;t immediately quashed 9th circuit style. Funny how the system almost always defaults to letting the tyranny stand during appeal but not the liberty.

Their shitty arguments are a big middle finger to all of us and they get off on it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why bother with good arguments when the system has already decided on your favor? Sure, they hit a speed bump now and then but the uniparty and the entirely neo-feudalist system has decided gun control/bans are the future.</p>
<p>Any hearing is a formality and any decision in favor of liberty is only temporary assuming it isn&#8217;t immediately quashed 9th circuit style. Funny how the system almost always defaults to letting the tyranny stand during appeal but not the liberty.</p>
<p>Their shitty arguments are a big middle finger to all of us and they get off on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
