“Better make this Halloween an epic one, people. And cancel any Thanksgiving or Christmas plans you may have for this year. Because, according to ‘scientists’ in ‘a new study,’ the aliens are coming, and they are at least as mean as those ones in Independence Day.
…
‘Possibly hostile’ alien threat detected in unknown interstellar object,…” [spoiler: its the comet 3I/ATLAS AKA C/2025 N1 (ATLAS) and previously as A11pl3Z] “… a shocking new study claims https://trib.al/Fjv1WOJ …

And, like the beginning of Ghostbusters II, we have an oddly specific date about when they will attack and wipe us all out.

A mysterious intergalactic object could potentially be a ‘hostile’ alien spacecraft that’s slated to attack our planet in November, according to a controversial new study by a small group of scientists.

‘The consequences, should the hypothesis turn out to be correct, could potentially be dire for humanity,’ the researchers wrote in the inflammatory paper, which was published July 16 to the preprint server arXiv, South West News Service reported.
…”

https://twitchy.com/grateful-calvin/2025/07/26/scientists-spot-hostile-alien-spacecraft-provide-oddly-specific-attack-date-of-november-2025-n2416255

“Over the last several decades, you could count on your fingers (and maybe a few toes) the number of government programs that have been canceled — no matter how obsolete, inefficient or wasteful they were, and despite the fact that, in some rare cases, their missions were accomplished.

Even Ronald Reagan, who called for the cancelation of scores of programs, couldn’t get Congress to end the eternal life-support system. After watching Congress fund even the most inefficient agencies, he famously groused that “the closest thing to immortality on this earth is a government program.”

But to quote the back-in-vogue poet of the people, Bob Dylan, the times they are a-changin’ in Washington.

Last week the seemingly impossible happened. Congress terminated at least a half-dozen major programs, many of which fiscal hawks have been trying to terminate for nearly half a century.

The Trump rescission bill made it through the House and Senate and mothballs federal funding for National Public Radio, public TV and the U.S. Agency for International Development. Sorry, Elmo: Billionaires don’t qualify for taxpayer subsidies anymore. Meanwhile, the House Appropriations Committee pulled the plug on funding the corrupt World Bank — the multibillion dollar piggy bank for globalists.

Nearly 100 parasitic “public interest groups” signed a joint letter howling in unison that this move to defund corrupt foreign aid giveaways would surely kill thousands — even millions — of people. Most of these groups are major recipients of the government largesse that is going away.

They are the epitome of the swamp.

Bravo to the Republicans for not caving in to them.

Meanwhile, the “Big, Beautiful” tax bill cancels many of the Green New Deal taxpayer handouts and the mandate that Americans and the government must buy electric vehicles. President Donald Trump has pulled the U.S. out of the World Health Organization, which pulled all the wrong levers during COVID-19 and then covered up its lethal errors and lies.

Critics dismiss these cutbacks as fiscal small ball — the equivalent of someone $10,000 in debt cutting their spending habit by $5.

But Trump is ushering in a much-needed cultural shift in the way Washington operates.

He is proving that Washington really CAN get rid of programs that don’t work. Does an enterprise losing $2 trillion a year need to be spending tax dollars on such supposed necessities as promoting veganism in Zambia, funding pride parades in Lesotho, wind farms in Ukraine, DEIA contractors in Belarus, promoting gender diversity in East Europe, and reproductive health climate policies in Central America?

Thanks to North Dakota Sen. Kevin Cramer for supplying this list of absurdities that are finally going away.

These and dozens of other programs have been zeroed out.

The worry, of course, is that Trump kills these programs only to see the next Democrat administration resurrect them like vampires.

Maybe. But for now, at least, the vast warehouse of thousands of federal programs — most of which you’ve almost certainly never heard of — is shrinking. They aren’t immortal after all.

Something tells me that somewhere up in heaven, Reagan is smiling.”

https://hotair.com/stephen-moore/2025/07/26/the-end-of-immortality-in-washington-n3805156

https://redstate.com/wardclark/2025/07/25/theres-another-big-beautiful-bill-in-the-works-what-might-be-in-it-n2192073

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdTOF1QtVdg

And this part of that false accusational section…”.. it’s a reflection of why constitutional rights should never be subject to bureaucratic discretion or political convenience.”

That’s not supported by what you write in that section. What happened is a reflection of nothing. A whole section falsely implying a crime happened that did not happen…to make a false point for the section because its based on implied accusation of a crime that did not happen…do you not know what context means?

And then you put it under this bolded heading for that section …
“Hypocrisy at the Highest Level”

And by doing
so basically directly accused the man of actually committing the crime you claim. You can’t have hypocrisy if not happend to be be a hypocrite about. The only hypocrisy here for this section was yours, the hypocrisy of presenting journalism as if true fact of a crime when it is in fact false.

This is not the first time this Texas gun rights group has presented an article with slanted wording implying a condition as true when in fact it was false.

If Trump had comitted such a crime, if there was any evidence pointing that way, I would have been wanting it looked at more closely and if he did such a crime I would have wanted him prosecuted for the crime.

But nothing happened, no crime was comitted, and even if Trump had made such a purchase … pending charges, as you state, are not convictions thus not prohibiting and he could have had it shipped to a Florida FFL and would have been able to legally purchase in SC as long as he didn’t take direct posession in SC upon purchase and had it shipped to a Florida FFL, and no crime comitted. In SC it would have only been a violation of state law if he would have taken direct possession upon purchase and not sent to a Florida FFL. People do this all the time, out of state ordering or purchasing from a SC FFL and having it sent to an FFL in their state, heck, I’ve done it myself and its perfectly legal.

You have some good information in your article. But the inclusion of this non-story false accusational section was way out of line and, although you did not intend it maybe your personal axe grinding and inclusion of inference prompting false produced, a typical left wing media smear tactic with blatant false and did nothing to support your article with fact.

And during the first two years of Trump’s first term, he faced a Republican Party that was very hostile to him (and to their constituents, whom they regularly screwed over until Trump began to change the party), led by McConnell and Ryan. Now that McConnell is on his way out, he is very open about that hostility.

Trump told Ryan that he needed to fund border security, and Ryan advised him to focus on tax cuts, promising they would address that later. They secured the tax cuts; then Ryan stayed long enough to ensure that Trump couldn’t implement his agenda until the Dems could take over. The UniParty in action.

Also, buying a gun in SC is still perfectly legal… as long as he had it sent to a Florida FFL.