You got that right. The end of the skit makes everyone who even thinks that “GUNS” is a good idea is a fool and a jerk. It implies that EVERYONE is gonna be shot sooner or later. I don’t think the writers of the skit were trying to support the 2nd at all, in fact, I think they were doing the exact opposite. Redneck good ole boy who soon gets shot and is never heard from again. The whole skit displays their whole agenda.

Or, the order of the initial list has no connection to “importance”.

Actually, the original set of Amendments totaled twelve. The first one never gained acceptance and the second one was shelved for almost two centuries before being resurrected and ratified by the States to become effective in 1992 as our most recent and 27 Amendment – deals with Congress’ pay raises.

So the third became our 1st, and the fourth became the 2nd, etc. If we see this as the Founders originally did when they were first brought to discussion, this means they considered the matter of Congress not being able to vote immediate pay raises for themselves as more pressing than the freedoms of speech, press, religious expression, peaceful assembly, petition of grievances, and the RKBA.

You should have seen Florida in 1987 when they went ‘shall issue’, the letters to the editor warned of literal rivers of blood and gun battles for parking spots at Walmart.

Seriously! And since 1987, your chance of being killed by a gun are less than one-half of what they were in 1986. It’s almost as if, more guns mean less crime…