And anybody labeling an AR-15 a “weapon of war” is just proving their ignorance. Few people, even from the Brady Bunch, would consider the bolt-action Springfield 30-06 a “weapon of war”, and yet our Army and Marines fought WW I largely with bolt-action Springfields. Name the war (that the US was involved in) where the AR-15 was an issue weapon. The hoplophobes on the anti-gun side, if they weren’t allowed to spout ignorance, lies, and appeals to emotion, would have nothing to say.

uncommon,

AYFKMRN??? The “violent criminals” are her constituents and probably a substantial chunk of her voters. It is ironic that so many of the most violent cities have one thing in common – Dimocrat control, usually going back multiple decades. And many of them also have among the country’s most restrictive “gun laws”. Perhaps it has more to do with the Dimocrat base than any particular gun laws?? Nah, couldn’t be.

But that would decrease violent crime which is very obviously *not* the goal. Ask your liberal friends and family why Democrats want violent crime, open borders, and endless government resources spent on non-citizens. What would be the end goal of a political party that did those things?

They like the chaos inducing violence. That’s why they don’t prosecute criminals. And order the local police to stand down.

Trump deploying the National guard really screws up their plans. The residents have become accustomed to the crime. But seeing a republican president successfully stop it will cause many to change the way they vote.

How many will change their votes? Enough to keep the congress in republican control.

Apparently old-school thumb tacks are lacking so now we need “advanced PDF taks”.

I find it incredibly interesting that Mayor Lee fails to voice and support a much more effective alternative strategy: get violent criminals off the streets of America.