<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Supreme Court Grants Cert In Another Major Second Amendment Case	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/supreme-court-grants-cert-in-another-major-second-amendment-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/supreme-court-grants-cert-in-another-major-second-amendment-case/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 16:30:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Geoff PR		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/supreme-court-grants-cert-in-another-major-second-amendment-case/comment-page-1/#comment-98000</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoff PR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 06:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=29448#comment-98000</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/supreme-court-grants-cert-in-another-major-second-amendment-case/comment-page-1/#comment-97652&quot;&gt;LKB&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;Yes Rico, Kaboom!&quot;

Clarify, please?

RICO is a prosecution, &#039;Wolford v. Lopez&#039; is interlocutory, not yet a finalized decision.

Doesn&#039;t the SCotUS usually avoid interlocutory injunctions?

What are the national implications that can be expected???]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/supreme-court-grants-cert-in-another-major-second-amendment-case/comment-page-1/#comment-97652">LKB</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;Yes Rico, Kaboom!&#8221;</p>
<p>Clarify, please?</p>
<p>RICO is a prosecution, &#8216;Wolford v. Lopez&#8217; is interlocutory, not yet a finalized decision.</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t the SCotUS usually avoid interlocutory injunctions?</p>
<p>What are the national implications that can be expected???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dude		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/supreme-court-grants-cert-in-another-major-second-amendment-case/comment-page-1/#comment-97845</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 02:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=29448#comment-97845</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Boom? I was told just yesterday, on this site, that Trump and the DOJ were selling us out — which is it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boom? I was told just yesterday, on this site, that Trump and the DOJ were selling us out — which is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LKB		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/supreme-court-grants-cert-in-another-major-second-amendment-case/comment-page-1/#comment-97652</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LKB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 19:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=29448#comment-97652</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47VqCD5AE9s

Yes Rico, Kaboom!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47VqCD5AE9s" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47VqCD5AE9s</a></p>
<p>Yes Rico, Kaboom!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Shire-man		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/supreme-court-grants-cert-in-another-major-second-amendment-case/comment-page-1/#comment-97608</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shire-man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 17:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=29448#comment-97608</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I hate shit like this. Wasting time spinning their wheels trying to get tyrant lunatics to go along with prior rulings while bigger fish need frying. Like petulant children arguing as children do over meaningless technicalities and semantics.
Instead of letting these little fascys nickel and dime and tit for tat with our rights hoping for an eventual court that will more favorably view tyranny hows about a nuclear cudgel to smack these fools into mush once and for all?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate shit like this. Wasting time spinning their wheels trying to get tyrant lunatics to go along with prior rulings while bigger fish need frying. Like petulant children arguing as children do over meaningless technicalities and semantics.<br />
Instead of letting these little fascys nickel and dime and tit for tat with our rights hoping for an eventual court that will more favorably view tyranny hows about a nuclear cudgel to smack these fools into mush once and for all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
