<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A GOP Goal Should be an Optional Federal Concealed Carry Permit	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/a-gop-goal-should-be-an-optional-federal-concealed-carry-permit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/a-gop-goal-should-be-an-optional-federal-concealed-carry-permit/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:28:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hush		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/a-gop-goal-should-be-an-optional-federal-concealed-carry-permit/comment-page-1/#comment-1225</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=4881#comment-1225</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/a-gop-goal-should-be-an-optional-federal-concealed-carry-permit/comment-page-1/#comment-1217&quot;&gt;.40 cal Booger&lt;/a&gt;.

@ .40 cal Booger:  did you mean &quot;rogue&quot; Democrat vs rouge Democrat?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/a-gop-goal-should-be-an-optional-federal-concealed-carry-permit/comment-page-1/#comment-1217">.40 cal Booger</a>.</p>
<p>@ .40 cal Booger:  did you mean &#8220;rogue&#8221; Democrat vs rouge Democrat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: I Haz A Question		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/a-gop-goal-should-be-an-optional-federal-concealed-carry-permit/comment-page-1/#comment-1219</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[I Haz A Question]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=4881#comment-1219</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/a-gop-goal-should-be-an-optional-federal-concealed-carry-permit/comment-page-1/#comment-1218&quot;&gt;.40 cal Booger&lt;/a&gt;.

Beat me to it.  I have nothing to add to what you&#039;ve already stated on my behalf.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/a-gop-goal-should-be-an-optional-federal-concealed-carry-permit/comment-page-1/#comment-1218">.40 cal Booger</a>.</p>
<p>Beat me to it.  I have nothing to add to what you&#8217;ve already stated on my behalf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: .40 cal Booger		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/a-gop-goal-should-be-an-optional-federal-concealed-carry-permit/comment-page-1/#comment-1218</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[.40 cal Booger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=4881#comment-1218</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/a-gop-goal-should-be-an-optional-federal-concealed-carry-permit/comment-page-1/#comment-1214&quot;&gt;Hush&lt;/a&gt;.

“universal background checks” has nothing to do with permitting for carry. 

“universal background checks” is about eventual confiscation, and the left wing has already said as much. So I&#039;m not willing to give them “universal background checks” to get a &#039;Federal concealed carry permit&#039; to do what is already a right to do under the 2A. I mean, when you see the slogan &quot;The Second Amendment is my permit.&quot; its just not trying to be cute, it actually is your &#039;permit&#039; and its only the desire for control by government and invented legal wrangling driven by, essentially, racism at its roots that makes it the way it is today.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/a-gop-goal-should-be-an-optional-federal-concealed-carry-permit/comment-page-1/#comment-1214">Hush</a>.</p>
<p>“universal background checks” has nothing to do with permitting for carry. </p>
<p>“universal background checks” is about eventual confiscation, and the left wing has already said as much. So I&#8217;m not willing to give them “universal background checks” to get a &#8216;Federal concealed carry permit&#8217; to do what is already a right to do under the 2A. I mean, when you see the slogan &#8220;The Second Amendment is my permit.&#8221; its just not trying to be cute, it actually is your &#8216;permit&#8217; and its only the desire for control by government and invented legal wrangling driven by, essentially, racism at its roots that makes it the way it is today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: .40 cal Booger		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/a-gop-goal-should-be-an-optional-federal-concealed-carry-permit/comment-page-1/#comment-1217</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[.40 cal Booger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=4881#comment-1217</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We already have a &#039;federal carry permit&#039; for concealed. Those who qualify under the federal LEOSA have what is essentially a &#039;federal carry permit&#039;. And even though the federal law makes it valid in all 50 states, Democrat controlled states still refuse to accept it and/or further restrict.

The issue is not &#039;not&#039; having a &#039;federal carry permit&#039; or even nationwide constitutional carry. The issue is that even if we had a nationwide &#039;federal carry permit&#039; or even nationwide constitutional carry that was for all, that Democrat controlled states, like they did with their Bruen responses, would still refuse to accept it or hinder it despite the federal law, or even SCOTUS decision, making it valid. So overall, the main issue is unconstitutional acting rouge Democrat controlled governments in states and until those Marxist Soci -alist governments get reigned in or removed from power it would never be a true nationwide &#039;federal carry permit&#039; to carry in all states or even a true nationwide constitutional carry and we would still have basically what we have now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We already have a &#8216;federal carry permit&#8217; for concealed. Those who qualify under the federal LEOSA have what is essentially a &#8216;federal carry permit&#8217;. And even though the federal law makes it valid in all 50 states, Democrat controlled states still refuse to accept it and/or further restrict.</p>
<p>The issue is not &#8216;not&#8217; having a &#8216;federal carry permit&#8217; or even nationwide constitutional carry. The issue is that even if we had a nationwide &#8216;federal carry permit&#8217; or even nationwide constitutional carry that was for all, that Democrat controlled states, like they did with their Bruen responses, would still refuse to accept it or hinder it despite the federal law, or even SCOTUS decision, making it valid. So overall, the main issue is unconstitutional acting rouge Democrat controlled governments in states and until those Marxist Soci -alist governments get reigned in or removed from power it would never be a true nationwide &#8216;federal carry permit&#8217; to carry in all states or even a true nationwide constitutional carry and we would still have basically what we have now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/a-gop-goal-should-be-an-optional-federal-concealed-carry-permit/comment-page-1/#comment-1216</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=4881#comment-1216</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/a-gop-goal-should-be-an-optional-federal-concealed-carry-permit/comment-page-1/#comment-1215&quot;&gt;Geoff &quot;I&#039;m getting too old for this shit&quot; PR&lt;/a&gt;.

EDIT -

&quot;Konstadinos Moros is an Associate Attorney with Michel &#038; Associates, a law firm in Long Beach that regularly represents the California Rifle &#038; Pistol Association (CRPA) in its litigation efforts to restore the Second Amendment in California.&quot;

Mr. Moros is obviously a fully-qualified and licensed lawyer in the state of California interested in defending the Second Ammendment, why isn&#039;t he doing as I suggested and suing for his and everyone else&#039;s fundamental right to keep and bear arms?

Mr. Moros, what do you have to say in reply?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/a-gop-goal-should-be-an-optional-federal-concealed-carry-permit/comment-page-1/#comment-1215">Geoff &#8220;I&#8217;m getting too old for this shit&#8221; PR</a>.</p>
<p>EDIT &#8211;</p>
<p>&#8220;Konstadinos Moros is an Associate Attorney with Michel &amp; Associates, a law firm in Long Beach that regularly represents the California Rifle &amp; Pistol Association (CRPA) in its litigation efforts to restore the Second Amendment in California.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mr. Moros is obviously a fully-qualified and licensed lawyer in the state of California interested in defending the Second Ammendment, why isn&#8217;t he doing as I suggested and suing for his and everyone else&#8217;s fundamental right to keep and bear arms?</p>
<p>Mr. Moros, what do you have to say in reply?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/a-gop-goal-should-be-an-optional-federal-concealed-carry-permit/comment-page-1/#comment-1215</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=4881#comment-1215</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Even a federal carry permit is a longshot, but it’s just on the outer edge of what’s possible.&quot;

Bullshit, just request a national federal carry permit, and when denied, file a federal lawsuit demanding a federal carry permit.

A driver&#039;s license is valid in every state and territory, so should my right to travel armed...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Even a federal carry permit is a longshot, but it’s just on the outer edge of what’s possible.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bullshit, just request a national federal carry permit, and when denied, file a federal lawsuit demanding a federal carry permit.</p>
<p>A driver&#8217;s license is valid in every state and territory, so should my right to travel armed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hush		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/a-gop-goal-should-be-an-optional-federal-concealed-carry-permit/comment-page-1/#comment-1214</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=4881#comment-1214</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Seems to be a reasonable natural progression.   Since there is a push for mandatory &quot;universal background checks&quot; then it is only reasonable that an optional Federal concealed carry permit would be available for those so desiring.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to be a reasonable natural progression.   Since there is a push for mandatory &#8220;universal background checks&#8221; then it is only reasonable that an optional Federal concealed carry permit would be available for those so desiring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
