<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: .32 Faceoff &#8211; KelTec P32 vs. Smith &#038; Wesson 432 UC	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/32-faceoff-keltec-p32-vs-smith-wesson-432-uc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/32-faceoff-keltec-p32-vs-smith-wesson-432-uc/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2024 21:38:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: John		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/32-faceoff-keltec-p32-vs-smith-wesson-432-uc/comment-page-1/#comment-3615</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2024 21:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=5411#comment-3615</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/32-faceoff-keltec-p32-vs-smith-wesson-432-uc/comment-page-1/#comment-1650&quot;&gt;Dude&lt;/a&gt;.

The weight your talking about on your pistol, you could get a Ruger LCP Max (.380) that holds 12+1 for 15 ounces total weight loaded and then there is no need to carry a back up mag.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/32-faceoff-keltec-p32-vs-smith-wesson-432-uc/comment-page-1/#comment-1650">Dude</a>.</p>
<p>The weight your talking about on your pistol, you could get a Ruger LCP Max (.380) that holds 12+1 for 15 ounces total weight loaded and then there is no need to carry a back up mag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/32-faceoff-keltec-p32-vs-smith-wesson-432-uc/comment-page-1/#comment-3614</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2024 21:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=5411#comment-3614</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have a P32, and if you study ballistic gel tests, there is ONE hollow point that feeds reliably AND gets to proper penetration at 11 to 13 inches. That&#039;s the Hornady XTP. There are a few channels on YouTube that show the ballistics gel tests on these. They expand and reach proper penetration. I personally have put 150 rounds of the XTPs through my P32 and never had a problem.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a P32, and if you study ballistic gel tests, there is ONE hollow point that feeds reliably AND gets to proper penetration at 11 to 13 inches. That&#8217;s the Hornady XTP. There are a few channels on YouTube that show the ballistics gel tests on these. They expand and reach proper penetration. I personally have put 150 rounds of the XTPs through my P32 and never had a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dude		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/32-faceoff-keltec-p32-vs-smith-wesson-432-uc/comment-page-1/#comment-1650</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=5411#comment-1650</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d be much more interested in the Model 432 UC  if it came in .327 fed magnum. Recoil isn&#039;t an issue with my pocket .380 that weighs about 13 oz. With MagGuts, it holds 8+1. It&#039;s light enough to forget that you&#039;re carrying it. Add a spare mag, and you have 17 rounds of .380 that&#039;s light and super easy to conceal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be much more interested in the Model 432 UC  if it came in .327 fed magnum. Recoil isn&#8217;t an issue with my pocket .380 that weighs about 13 oz. With MagGuts, it holds 8+1. It&#8217;s light enough to forget that you&#8217;re carrying it. Add a spare mag, and you have 17 rounds of .380 that&#8217;s light and super easy to conceal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
