Spiking the Hearing Protection and SHORT Acts in the Senate Isn’t Enough for the Gun Control Industry
Giffords has a problem with the latest provision the Senate has inserted in the Big Beautiful Bill, even after it’s […]
Giffords has a problem with the latest provision the Senate has inserted in the Big Beautiful Bill, even after it’s […]
Last night, the Senate chose what’s behind door number one. They’ve added language to the One Big Beautiful Bill that would eliminate the NFA’s $200 tax on suppressors, SBRs, SBSs and machineguns.
The fact that the National Firearms Act has been defended as a tax on gun ownership by the federal government
At this point everyone following the National Firearms Act debate is well aware of then-Attorney General Cummings’ famous testimony in
The Senate’s move to gut large sections of the NFA is one of the most significant pro-gun reforms in nearly a century. But unless the holes are closed, gun owners could face legal limbo in anti-gun states and suppressor sales could stall at a critical moment.
Typically there’s some trade-off between reducing sound at the shooter’s ear and increasing downrange sound, but in the case of the ROC556L it was all-around one of the very quietest suppressed AR-15 setups we’ve shot.
Giffords’ push poll claims that the Hearing Protection Act would eliminate background checks on suppressor sales. That is an outright lie and Giffords knows it.
Anti-gun logic: Mass murderers use silencers (they don’t) so their victims can’t hear the gun shots (from bullets that go