California’s Broader Protection Orders Likely Won’t Stand Up, Even After Rahimi
The [Rahimi] decision, however, does not validate all restraining order statutes. Consider, for instance, California Code of Civil Procedure § 527.6; […]
Law and the Courts
After Rahimi, Bruen Remains Tanned, Rested, and Ready for Future Cases
By focusing on Rahimi’s “dangerous” conduct, the high court did not foreclose a series of other challenges to federal disarmament
The Contorted Rahimi Ruling Didn’t Damage Bruen as Anti-Gunners Had Hoped
Today’s narrow Supreme Court decision in Rahimi failed to produce the damage the anti-gun crowd hoped for against Bruen. The
BREAKING: In Rahimi, Supreme Court Rules Individuals Found to Be a Threat Can Be Temporarily Disarmed
Zackey Rahimi wouldn’t be considered a good guy in anyone’s book. Take a look at this impressive record . .
In Cargill, SCOTUS Ruled that Words Mean Things and Congress Writes the Laws
By Shelby Baird Smith Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court took a major step in reining in the Bureau of
Garland v. Cargill Strengthens the Plaintiffs’ Case on ATF’s Force Reset Trigger Ban
In August 2022, A.T.F. agents showed up at the home of a Rare Breed customer, Patrick Carey, near Baton Rouge,
OSD: The Cargill Ruling Makes Eventually Taking Down the NFA Look Problematic
Antonin Scalia once described the presumption against ineffectiveness as “the idea that Congress presumably does not enact useless laws”. (He probably
Never Interrupt Your Opponent When She’s Making a Mistake
With the announcement of Friday’s 6-3 Supreme Court decision overturning the block on bump stocks, there were the usual responses
Cargill: We Can Use the Bump Stock Ruling to Protect Everything
I was told over five years ago, ‘Why are you going down this road? No one cares about bump stocks.