The Firearms Policy Coalition is challenging the federal ban on handgun sales to out-of-state buyers. There’s no good reason for someone to be prohibited from buying a handgun in another state after passing a background check.
Even after losing in the state’s highest court, Cook County has made it clear that they have no intention of ending its illegal collection of taxes on every gun sold in the county along with the ammo to feed them.
Part of the Biden administration’s years-long war on guns, gun owners, and those who make and sell them has been
After the Third Circuit ruled in favor of the plaintiffs preventing Pennsylvania’s ban, the state appealed to the Supreme Court. SCOTUS then sent the case back to be considered again in light of the high court’s Rahimi decision.
In the 2008 District of Columbia v. Heller U.S. Supreme Court decision, Justice Antonin Scalia contemplated potential location restrictions governments could impose
“I have no special affection for felons, either,” [Judge David R. Stras] wrote, “but the Second Amendment does not care. It says what it says, and so do the Supreme Court decisions interpreting it.”
The unfortunate truth is that even if your local prosecutor celebrates the righteous use of force in self-defense situations, good guys can and do still screw things up in the aftermath of defending their lives. Don’t be that guy.
Our national right to keep and bear arms isn’t a second-class civil right subject to local rules, opinions, or interpretations.
CNN is hyperventilating over a Florida case in which prosecutors cleared a 79-year-old man of charges using the state’s stand your ground laws after he shot and killed his neighbor’s son who threatened him with a chainsaw.
Common use of AR-15s for self-defense can be the secondary argument, but the primary argument should be that common bearable arms that are useful in combat are the most protected of all, as all of the historical commentary confirms.
